Magistrate's Court Sentencing Guidelines - Motoring

​​​​​​ ​​​​ ​​Embedded Image

Magistrate’s Court of Jersey

Sentencing Guidelines

Part 1: Motoring Offences

Contents

Guideline
Number
​​OffenceArticle​Page
1 Careless drivingArt 253
2 Causing serious injury by careless drivingArt 26A5
3 Causing death by careless drivingArt 25A7
4 Causing serious injury by careless driving (Drink or Drugs)Art 26B9
5 Causing death by careless driving (Drink or Drugs)Art 269
6 Dangerous drivingArt 2210
7 Causing serious injury by dangerous drivingArt 23A12
8 Causing death by dangerous drivingArt 2314
9 Construction, equipment and useArt 7715
10 Forgery etc. of licencesArt 1816
11 Driving whilst disqualifiedArt 15(4)(b)17
12 Driving whilst unfitArt 2718
13 Driving without a licenceArt 419
14 Driving / being in charge with excess alcoholArt 2820
15 Failure to give informationArt 8622
16 Failure to provide a roadside breath specimenArt 29(4)23
17 Failure to provide a specimen for analysisArt 30(7)24
18 Failure to stop / report an accidentArt 5225
19 Failure to stop for an officer and give name and addressArt 5126
20 Driving without insuranceArt 2(1) TPI27
21 Failure to display an insurance discArt 16 TPI29
22 Failure to produce an insurance certificateArt 15 TPI30
23 Falsification or wrongful use of an insurance certificate or discArt 18 TPI31
24 Holding a telephone whilst driving when the vehicle is in motionArt 5032
25 Failure to comply with provisional licence conditionsArt 11(2)33
26 Falsification or misleading declarations / failure to notify change in registration documentsArt 11 MV Reg34
27 Failure to wear a seatbeltArts 41/4235
28 SpeedingArt 21 + 2, 3 & 4 RT(SL)36
29 Tampering with a motor vehicleArt 5437
30 Neglect of traffic directionsArt 74(1) (a and b)38
31 Taking a vehicle without consentArt 5339

 

1

Careless driv​ing

Ro​​ad Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956, Art 25

 

Maximum:        Level 3 fine (£10,000)

May endorse and may disqualify.  Must order retest if disqualified (Art 35 RTL)

 

​​A. Identify the appropriate starting point

Starting points based on first time offender pleading guilty

Examples of nature of activity

Starting point​​Range

Disqualify/

Endorse

​A

Driving at low sp​eed, with loss of concentration or misjudgment

£1,500

£1,000 - £2,000

Consider both

B

Loss of control due to speed, mishandling or insufficient attention to road conditions, or carelessly turning across on-coming traffic​

£2,500

£2,000 - £3,000

1-6 months

/Yes

C

Driving at speed / maneuvering causing a collision. Any driving bordering on the dangerous

£4,000

£3,000 - £5,000

6 – 12 months

 

B. Offence seriousness (culpability and harm)

Consider the effect of aggravating and mitigating factors

(other than those within examples above)

The following may be particularly relevant, but these lists are not exhaustive

Factor indicating higher culpability

  1. Excessive speed
  2. Carrying out other tasks while driving
  3. Carrying passengers or heavy load
  4. Tiredness
  5. Adverse weather
  6. Poor road conditions
  7. Defective vehicle
  8. LGV/HGV/PSV
  9. Causing a collision

Factor indicating lower culpability

  1. Minor risk
  2. Sudden change in road or weather conditions

 

Factor indicating greater degree of harm

  1. Injury to others
  2. Damage to other vehicles or property
  3. High level of traffic or pedestrians in vicinity
  4. Location, e.g. near school when children are likely to be present

Factor indicating lesser degree of harm

  1. Gave assistance to injured person
  2. No collision
  3. No injury to others

 

Form a preliminary view of the appropriate sentence,
then consider offender mitigation

 

Consider endorsement or disqualification - must order retest if disqualified

 


 

2​

Causing serious injury by ​careless driving

Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956, Art 26A

 

Maximum:        2 years imprisonment and a fine

 

May disqualify.  Must order retest if disqualified (Art 35 RTL)

 

A. Identify the appropriate starting point

Starting points based on first time offender pleading guilty

Examples of nature of activity

Starting point

Range

Disqualify

A

Driving at low speed, with loss of concentration or misjudgment

£4,000

£2,000 - 2 months

6 - 12

months

B

Loss of control due to speed, mishandling or insufficient attention to road conditions, or carelessly turning across on-coming traffic

4 months

3 – 6 months

12 - 24 months

C

Driving at speed / maneuvering causing a collision. Any driving bordering on the dangerous

9 months

6 – 12 months

24 – 36+months

 

B. Consider the effect of aggravating and mitigating factors

(other than those within examples above)

The following may be particularly relevant but these lists are not exhaustive

Factor indicating higher culpability

  1. Excessive speed
  2. Carrying out other tasks while driving
  3. Carrying passengers or heavy load
  4. Tiredness
  5. Adverse weather
  6. Poor road conditions
  7. Defective vehicle
  8. LGV/HGV/PSV

Factor indicating lower culpability

  1. Minor risk
  2. Sudden change in road or weather conditions

 


Factor indicating greater degree of harm

  1. Seriousness/permanence of principal injury
  2. Injury to other persons
  3. Damage to other vehicles or property
  4. High level of traffic or pedestrians in vicinity
  5. Location, e.g. near school when children are likely to be present

Factor indicating lesser degree of harm

  1. ​Gave assistance to injured person

 

Form a preliminary view of the appropriate sentence,
then consider offender mitigation

 

Consider disqualification - must order retest if disqualified


 

3​

Causing death by c​areless driving

Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956, Art 25A

 

Maximum:        5 years imprisonment and a fine

 

Must disqualify for 12 months plus.  Must order retest (Art 35 RTL).

 

A. Identify the appropriate starting point

Starting points based on first time offender pleading guilty

Examples of nature of activity

Starting point

Range

Disqualify

A

Driving at low speed, with loss of concentration or misjudgment

£6,000

£4,000 – 5 months

12 – 24 months

B

Loss of control due to speed, mishandling or insufficient attention to road conditions, or carelessly turning across on-coming traffic

9 months

6 months – Send to Royal Court

24 – 36+

months

C

Driving at speed / maneuvering causing a collision. Any driving bordering on the dangerous

Send to Royal Court

 

B. Consider the effect of aggravating and mitigating factors

(other than those within examples above)

The following may be particularly relevant, but these lists are not exhaustive

Factor indicating higher culpability

  1. Excessive speed
  2. Carrying out other tasks while driving
  3. Carrying passengers or heavy load
  4. Tiredness
  5. Adverse weather
  6. Poor road conditions
  7. Defective vehicle
  8. LGV/HGV/PSV

Factor indicating lower culpability

  1. Minor risk
  2. Sudden change in road or weather conditions

 

Factors indicating greater degree of harm

  1. Injury to persons other than the deceased
  2. Damage to other vehicles or property
  3. High level of traffic or pedestrians in vicinity
  4. Location, e.g. near school when children are likely to be present

Factor indicating lesser degree of harm

  1. ​Gave assistance to injured person

 

 

Form a preliminary view of the appropriate sentence,
then consider offender mitigation

 

Must disqualify and order retest

 

 


 

4​

Causing serious injury by careless driving (Drink or Drugs)

Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956, Art 26B

 

Maximum:        4 years imprisonment and/or a fine

 

Must disqualify for 2 years plus.  3 years for second/subsequent offence within 10 years.

 

Must order retest (Art 35 RTL).

 

This offence is generally too serious for the Magistrate’s Court and should be sent to the Royal Court.

5​

Causing death by careless driving (Drink or Drugs)

Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956, Art 26

 

Maximum:        10 years imprisonment and/or a fine

 

Must endorse and must disqualify for 2 years plus.  3 years for second/subsequent offence within 10 years. 

 

Must order retest (Art 35 RTL).

 

This offence is generally too serious for the Magistrate’s Court and should be sent to the Royal Court.


 

6

Dangerous driving

Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956, Art 22

 

Maximum:        2 years imprisonment and/or a fine

Must endorse and must disqualify minimum 12 months.  Must order retest (Art 35).

 

A. Identify the appropriate starting point

Starting points based on first time offender pleading guilty

Examples of nature of activity

Starting point

Range

Disqualify

A

Momentary incident of dangerous driving

£4,000

£3,000 -£5,000

12 -18 months

B

Incident(s) involving excessive speed, showing off or significant risk to others, especially on busy roads or in a built-up area

4 months

2 – 6 months

18 – 24 months

C

Prolonged bad driving or driving that involves deliberate disregard for the safety of others

9 months

6 – 12 months

24 – 36 months

 

B. Consider the effect of aggravating and mitigating factors

(other than those within examples above)

The following may be particularly relevant, but these lists are not exhaustive

Factor indicating higher culpability

  1. Disregarding warnings of others
  2. Evidence of alcohol or drugs
  3. Carrying out other tasks while driving
  4. Carrying passengers or heavy load
  5. Tiredness
  6. Aggressive driving, such as driving much too close to vehicle in front, racing, inappropriate attempts to overtake, or cutting in after overtaking
  7. Driving when knowingly suffering from a medical condition which significantly impairs the offender’s driving skills
  8. Driving a poorly maintained or dangerously loaded vehicle, especially where motivated by commercial concerns
  9. Lengthy episode
  10. Disqualified driver
  11. Avoiding arrest
  12. LGV/HGV/PSV

Factor indicating lower culpability

  1. Genuine emergency
  2. Speed not excessive

Factor indicating greater degree of harm

  1. Injury to other persons
  2. Damage to other vehicles or property
  3. High level of traffic or pedestrians in vicinity
  4. Location, e.g. near school when children are likely to be present
  5. Caused collision

Factor indicating lesser degree of harm

  1. Gave assistance to injured person
  2. No collision
  3. No injury

 

 

Form a preliminary view of the appropriate sentence,
then consider offender mitigation

 

 

Must disqualify and order retest


 

7

Causing serious injury by dangerous driving

Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956, Art 23A

 

Maximum:        5 years imprisonment and a fine

 

Must disqualify minimum 2 years.  Must order retest (Art 35 RTL).

 

A. Identify the appropriate starting point

Starting points based on first time offender pleading guilty

Examples of nature of activity

Starting point

Range

Disqualify

A

Momentary incident of dangerous driving

6 months

4 – 12 months

24 months

B

Incident(s) involving excessive speed, showing off or significant risk to others, especially on busy roads or in built-up area

Send to Royal Court

9 months – Send to Royal Court

36+ months

C

Prolonged bad driving or driving that involves deliberate disregard for the safety of others

Send to Royal Court

 

B. Consider the effect of aggravating and mitigating factors

(other than those within examples above)

The following may be particularly relevant, but these lists are not exhaustive

Factor indicating higher culpability

  1. Disregarding warnings of others
  2. Evidence of alcohol or drugs
  3. Carrying out other tasks while driving
  4. Carrying passengers or heavy load
  5. Tiredness
  6. Aggressive driving, such as driving much too close to vehicle in front, racing, inappropriate attempts to overtake, or cutting in after overtaking
  7. Driving when knowingly suffering from a medical condition which significantly impairs the offender’s driving skills
  8. Driving a poorly maintained or dangerously loaded vehicle, especially where motivated by commercial concerns
  9. Lengthy episode
  10. Disqualified driver
  11. Avoiding arrest
  12. LGV/HGV/PSV

Factor indicating lower culpability

  1. Genuine emergency
  2. Speed not excessive

Factor indicating greater degree of harm

  1. Seriousness/permanence of principal injury
  2. s
  3. Da
  4. mage to other vehicles or property
  5. High level of traffic or pedestrians in vicinity
  6. Location, e.g. near school when children are likely to be present

Factor indicating lesser degree of harm

  1. Gave assistance to injured person

 

 

Form a preliminary view of the appropriate sentence,
then consider offender mitigation

 

 

Must disqualify and order retest


 

8​

Causing death by dangerous driving

Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956, Art 23

 

 

Maximum:        10 years imprisonment and/or a fine

Must disqualify minimum 2 years.  Must order retest (Art 35 of RTL).

 

This offence is generally too serious for the Magistrate’s Court and should be sent to the Royal Court.

​​9

Construction, equipment and use

Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956, Art 77

 

Maximum: Level 3 fine (£10,000)

 

May disqualify or endorse in certain cases, but not for a first lighting offence.  See Schedule 1, Parts D2 and D3.

 

A. Identify the appropriate starting point

Starting points based on first time offender pleading guilty

Examples of nature of activity

Starting point

Range

Disqualify/

Endorse

A

Single lighting or mechanical defect

£500

£200 - £750

Consider

B

Defect causing danger or multiple defects causing danger

£2,000

£1,000 - £7,000

Consider

 

B. Consider the effect of aggravating and mitigating factors

(other than those within examples above)

The following may be particularly relevant, but these lists are not exhaustive

Factor indicating higher culpability

  1. Multiple defects
  2. Heavy load or passengers being carried
  3. Commercial advantage gained
  4. Risk of accident/accident caused
  5. Driving at night with defective lighting

Factor indicating lower culpability

  1. Short distance driven
  2. Vehicle now repaired

Factor indicating greater degree of harm

  1. ​Injury or risk of injury to other road users

Factor indicating lesser degree of harm

  1. ​​Gave assistance to injured person

 

 

Form a preliminary view of the appropriate sentence,
then consider offender mitigation

 

 

​Consider endorsement / disqualification (See Schedule 1 Part D)

 

10​

Forgery etc. of licences

Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956, Art 18

 

Maximum:        2 years imprisonment and a fine – Art 18(1)

Level 3 fine (£10,000) – Art 18(2)

 

May not endorse or disqualify.

 

A. Identify the appropriate starting point

Starting points based on first time offender pleading guilty

Examples of nature of activityStarting point​Range
A Knowingly makes a false statement or withholds information to obtain a licence – Art 18(2)£2,000£1,500 - £4,000

B

Makes, forges, alters with intent to deceive – Art 18(1)

6 months

4 months to send to Royal Court

 

​​

B. Consider the effect of aggravating and mitigating factors​

(other than those within examples above)

The following may be particularly relevant, but these lists are not exhaustive

Factor indicating higher culpability

  1. Commercial benefit
  2. Lent to/used by disqualified driver
  3. Used as form of identification

Factor indicating lower culpability

 

Factor indicating lesser degree of harm

 

 

Form a preliminary view of the appropriate sentence,
then consider offender mitigation


 

11

Driving whilst disqualified

Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956, Art 15(4)(b)

 

Maximum: 12 months imprisonment and Level 3 fine (£10,000).

 

May endorse and may disqualify.  No power to order the test to be retaken though such an order may already be in existence.

 

A. Identify the appropriate starting point

Starting points based on first time offender pleading guilty

Examples of nature of activity

Starting point​

Range

Disqualify/

Endorse

A

Driving whilst subject to a disqualification.

6 months

3-8 months

Additional 6-12 months disqualification /

Consider

 

B. Consider the effect of aggravating and mitigating factors

(other than those within examples above)

The following may be particularly relevant, but these lists are not exhaustive

Factor indicating higher culpability

  1. Never passed test
  2. Planned long-term evasion
  3. Vehicle obtained during disqualification
  4. Driving for remuneration

Factor indicating lower culpability

  1. ​​Genuine emergency established

Factor indicating greater degree of harm

  1. Distance driven
  2. Evidence of poor driving
  3. Offender caused accident

 

 

Consider personal mitigation

 

Consider endorsement and disqualification


 

12

Driving whilst unfit through drink or drugs

Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956, Art 27

 

Maximum: 12 months imprisonment and Level 3 fine (£10,000)

 

Mandatory disqualification for a minimum period of 12 months, and must order retest (Art 35 RTL). Must disqualify for at least 3 years if offender has committed a relevant offence in preceding 10 years. Where special reasons are found not to disqualify, then endorsement may be ordered.

 

If there is a delay in sentencing after conviction impose an interim disqualification unless special reasons are raised

 

The full range of sentencing options is open to the court from £1,000 fine to 8 months in custody, based on a guilty plea with no previous relevant convictions.

 

The starting point will be determined on the level of impairment.

 

Where there is a high level of impairment or a second relevant offence within 10-year period there is a presumption towards custody.

 

The period to be imposed in any individual case will depend on an assessment of all the relevant circumstances, including the length of time since an earlier ban was imposed and the gravity of the current offence.

 

Consider the effect of aggravating and mitigating factors

(other than those within examples above)

The following may be particularly relevant, but these lists are not exhaustive

Factor indicating higher culpability

  1. LGV, HGV, PSV etc.
  2. Poor road or weather conditions
  3. Carrying passengers
  4. Driving for hire or reward
  5. Evidence of unacceptable standard of driving
  6. High likelihood of driving (In Charge)
  7. Evidence of multiple illegal drugs use

Factor indicating lower culpability

  1. Genuine emergency established*
  2. Very short distance driven*
  3. Low likelihood of driving (In Charge)

 

* even where not amounting to special reasons

Factor indicating greater degree of harm

  1. Involved in accident
  2. Location e.g. near school
  3. High level of traffic or pedestrians in the vicinity

Factor indicating lesser degree of harm

  1. ​​Gave assistance to injured person

 

Form a preliminary view of the appropriate sentence,
then consider offender mitigation

 

13​

Driving without a licence; employing an unlicensed driver

Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956, Art 4

 

Maximum: Level 3 fine (£10,000)

 

May endorse and may disqualify.

 

A. Identify the appropriate starting point

Starting points based on first time offender pleading guilty

Examples of nature of activity

Starting point

Range

Disqualify/Endorse

Lapsed full Jersey licence

£300

£200 - £500

No/No

Equivalent non-Jersey licence held

£500

£400 - £700

Consider

Never held a full licence.

Driving a category of vehicle for which licence not held

£2,000

£800 - £3,000

Disqualify 6-12 months

 

B. Consider the effect of aggravating and mitigating factors

(other than those within examples above)

The following may be particularly relevant, but these lists are not exhaustive

Factor indicating higher culpability

  1. Employer, especially if no proper enquiry made
  2. Never passed a test for category of vehicle being driven
  3. Planned long-term evasion
  4. Driving for remuneration
  5. LGV/HGV/PSV

Factor indicating lower culpability

  1. Genuine emergency established
  2. Lawful driving experience elsewhere

Factor indicating greater degree of harm

  1. Distance driven
  2. Evidence of associated bad driving
  3. Offender caused accident

Factor indicating lesser degree of harm

  1. ​​Gave assistance to injured person

 

Form a preliminary view of the appropriate sentence,
then consider offender mitigation

 

14​​Driving or being in charge with excess alcohol

Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956, Art 28(1)(a)

 

Maximum:        12 months imprisonment and Level 3 fine (£10,000)

 

Must disqualify for at least 12 months. Must disqualify for at least 3 years if offender has been convicted of a relevant offence in preceding 10 years.

 

Whilst the Court will consider custody in cases of band C and above, there is a presumption towards custody in the event of a second relevant offence within 10 year period.

 

Must order retest (Art 35 RTL).

 

A. Identify the appropriate starting point

Starting points based on first time offender pleading guilty

Disqualify/Endorse

Starting point

 

Range

 

Disqual.

 

Disqual. 2nd offence in 10 years

 

Breath (mcg)

Blood (ml)

Urine (ml)

A

36 - 49

81 – 114

108 – 152

£1,500

£1,000 - £2,000

12 – 15 months

36 months

B

50 – 69

115 – 160

153 – 213

£2,500

£2,000 - £3,000

15 – 18 months

36 + months

C

70 – 86

161 – 199

214 – 266

3 months

1 – 4 months

18 – 24 months

42 + months

D

87 - 104

200 – 241

267 – 320

5 months

4 – 6 months

24 – 36 months

​48 + months

E

105 +

2​​42 +

321 +

7 months

6 – 8 months

36+ months

54 + months

 

B. Consider the effect of aggravating and mitigating factors

(other than those within examples above)

The following may be particularly relevant, but these lists are not exhaustive

Factors indicating higher culpability

  1. LGV, HGV, PSV etc.
  2. Poor road or weather conditions
  3. Carrying passengers, especially if children
  4. Driving for hire or reward
  5. Evidence of unacceptable standard of driving
  6. Second or subsequent relevant conviction
  7. High likelihood of driving (In Charge)

Factors indicating lower culpability

  1. Genuine emergency established *
  2. Very short distance driven *
  3. Low likelihood of driving (In Charge)

* even where not amounting to special reasons

Factors indicating greater degree of harm

  1. Involved in accident
  2. Location, e.g. near school
  3. High level of traffic or pedestrians in the vicinity

Factors indicating lesser degree of harm

  1. ​Gave assistance to injured person

 

 

Form a preliminary view of the appropriate sentence,
then consider offender mitigation

 

Must disqualify and must order retest


 

15​​Failure to give informationRoad Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956, Art 86​

 

Maximum:        Level 3 fine (£10,000)

 

May not disqualify or endorse.

 

A. Identify the appropriate starting point

Starting points based on first time offender pleading guilty

Examples of nature of activity

 

Starting point

Range

A

A86(1) (a) Owner withholds information/

A86(1)(b) person withholds information.

£4,000

£2,000 - £6,000

 

B. Consider the effect of aggravating and mitigating factors

(other than those within examples above)

The following may be particularly relevant, but these lists are not exhaustive

Factor indicating higher culpability

  1. Seriousness of the alleged offence
  2. The urgency of obtaining the information

Factors indicating lower culpability

Factor indicating greater degree of harm

  1. ​Accident with damage and/or injury

Factor indicating lesser degree of harm

  1. ​Gave assistance to injured person

 

 

Form a preliminary view of the appropriate sentence,
then consider offender mitigation


 

16​

Failure to provide a roadside breath specimen

Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956, Art 29(4)

 

Maximum:        Level 2 fine (£1,000)

 

May endorse or disqualify.

 

 

A. Identify the appropriate starting point

Starting points based on first time offender pleading guilty

Examples of nature of activity

Starting point

Range

Disqualify/

Endorse

A

Defendant refused test or failed to complete test

£500

£400 - £600

Consider

 

B. Consider the effect of aggravating and mitigating factors

(other than those within examples above)

The following may be particularly relevant, but these lists are not exhaustive

Factor indicating higher culpability

  1. Obvious state of intoxication
  2. LGV, HGV, PSV etc.
  3. Driving for hire or reward

Factor indicating lower culpability

  1. ​Genuine but unsuccessful attempt to provide specimen

 

 

Form a preliminary view of the appropriate sentence,
then consider offender mitigation

 


Consider disqualification or endorsement


 

17​

Failure to provide specimen for analysis

Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956, Art 30(7)

 

Maximum:        12 months imprisonment and Level 3 fine (£10,000)

 

May endorse and must disqualify for at least 12 months.  Must disqualify for at least 3 years if offender has been convicted of a relevant offence in preceding 10 years.

 

There is a presumption towards custody in the event of a second relevant offence within 10 year period.

 

​Must order retest (Art 35 RTL).

 

A. Identify the appropriate starting point

Starting points based on first time offender pleading guilty

Examples of nature of activity

Starting point

Range

Disqual.

Disqual. 2nd offence in 10 years

A

Defendant failed to provide specimen

7 months

5 - 9 months

36+ months

54 + months

 

B. Consider the effect of aggravating and mitigating factors

(other than those within examples above)

The following may be particularly relevant, but these lists are not exhaustive

 

Factor indicating higher culpability

  1. Unacceptable standard of driving
  2. LGV, HGV, PSV etc.
  3. Obvious state of intoxication
  4. Driving for hire or reward

 

Factor indicating lower culpability

  1. Genuine but unsuccessful attempt to provide specimen
  2. Person who has not been driving or not been drinking

Factor indicating greater degree of harm

  1. ​Involved in an accident

Factor indicating lesser degree of harm

 

 

Form a preliminary view of the appropriate sentence,
then consider offender mitigation

 

Must disqualify and must order retest


 

18​

Failure to stop / report an accident

Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956, Art 52

 

Maximum:        6 months imprisonment and a Level 3 fine (£10,000)

 

May endorse and may disqualify.  No power to order a retest.

 

A. Identify the appropriate starting point

Starting points based on first time offender pleading guilty

Examples of nature of activity

Starting point

Range

Disqualify/

Endorse

A

Minor damage/no injury or stopped at scene but failed to exchange particulars or report.

£750

£500 - £1,000

No/Consider

B

Failed to stop at scene, or serious damage/more than minor injury, or evidence of bad driving, or evidence of drink or drugs, or evasion of test e.g. time of night/location

3 months

2 – 4 months

12 months plus (up to and including drink-drive level)/

Consider

 

B. Consider the effect of aggravating and mitigating factors

(other than those within examples above)

The following may be particularly relevant, but these lists are not exhaustive

Factor indicating higher culpability

  1. Knowledge/suspicion that personal injury caused (where not an element of the offence)
  2. Leaving injured party at scene
  3. Giving false details or vehicle not registered correctly
  4. Extent of any damage to vehicle or to 3rdparty property

Factor indicating lower culpability

  1. Believed identity known
  2. Genuine fear of retribution
  3. Reported shortly afterwards

 

Consider personal mitigation

 

Consider endorsement and disqualification


 

19

Failure to stop for an officer and give name and address

Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956, Art 51

 

Maximum:        Level 3 fine (£10,000)

 

May not disqualify or endorse

 

A. Identify the appropriate starting point

Starting points based on first time offender pleading guilty

Examples of nature of activity

Starting point

Range

A

 Fail to stop when required by a police or traffic officer – Art 51(1)

£2,500

£1,000 - £4,000

B

 Refuse to give information – Art 51(2)

£1,500

£1,000 - £3,000

C

 Give false information - Art 51(2)

£2,500

£1,000 - £4,000

 

B. Consider the effect of aggravating and mitigating factors

(other than those within examples above)

The following may be particularly relevant, but these lists are not exhaustive

Factor indicating higher culpability

  1. Seriousness of the underlying offence
  2. Gave false name and/or address
  3. Intention to avoid liability
  4. Officer in full uniform and clearly visible

Factor indicating lower culpability

Factor indicating greater degree of harm

  1. Accident with damage and/or injury
  2. People put at risk at the time of moving off

Factor indicating lesser degree of harm

  1. ​Gave assistance to injured person

 

 

Form a preliminary view of the appropriate sentence,
then consider offender mitigation

 

Note

 

Statutory defence re Article 51(1)

"… a person shall not be convicted of an offence under this paragraph if he or she proves to the satisfaction of the court that he or she had no reason to believe that the person requiring him or her to stop the vehicle was a Police or Traffic Officer."

20

Driving without insurance

Motor Traffic (Third Party Insurance) (Jersey) Law 1948, Art 2(1)

 

Maximum:        18 months imprisonment and/or Level 3 fine (£10,000)

 

May endorse or disqualify.  No power to order a retest.

 

A. Identify the appropriate starting point

Starting points based on first time offender pleading guilty

Examples of nature of activity

Starting point

Range

Disqualify / Endorse

A

Technical offence, e.g. where a vehicle is left on the road or in a public car park but not driven

£350

£200 - £500

No

B

Negligent as to whether insured

£2,500

£500 - £4,000

Consider/Yes

C

Highly negligent as to whether insured or deliberately driving whilst uninsured

3 months

1 – 6 months*

3 – 12 months

 

B. Consider the effect of aggravating and mitigating factors

(other than those within examples above)

The following may be particularly relevant, but these lists are not exhaustive

Factor indicating higher culpability

  1. Financial gain
  2. Gave false details
  3. Driving LGV, HGV, PSV etc.
  4. Carrying passengers
  5. Driving for hire or reward
  6. Evidence of sustained uninsured use
  7. Made no proper enquiry as to the existence of insurance
  8. Never passed test

Factor indicating lower culpability

  1. Responsibility for providing insurance rests with another
  2. Genuine misunderstanding
  3. Recent failure to renew or failure to transfer vehicle details where insurance was in existence

Factor indicating greater degree of harm

  1. Involved in accident
  2. Accident resulting in injury

Factor indicating lesser degree of harm

  1. ​Gave assistance to injured person

 

Consider endorsement and disqualification

 

Note

 

A disqualification of more than 6 months may be appropriate where there is evidence of sustained uninsured use.

 

*Companies deemed to fall within band C will be dealt with by financial penalty within the range of £3,500 - £6,000.

21

Failure to display an insurance disc

Motor Traffic (Third Party Insurance) (Jersey) Law 1948, Art 16

 

Maximum:        3 months imprisonment and Level 2 fine (£1,000).

 

May not disqualify or endorse

 

A. Identify the appropriate starting point

Starting points based on first time offender pleading guilty

Examples of nature of activity

Starting point

Range

A

Simple oversight in failing to place new WID in vehicle

£300

£100 - £400

B

Continuing failure after warning

£500

£400 - £600

 

B. Consider the effect of aggravating and mitigating factors

(other than those within examples above)

The following may be particularly relevant, but these lists are not exhaustive

Factor indicating higher culpability

1.      Passage of time since renewal

Factor indicating lower culpability

1.      Insurance company had failed to send new WID in time

 

Form a preliminary view of the appropriate sentence,
then consider offender mitigation


 

22​

Failure to produce an insurance certificate

Motor Traffic (Third Party Insurance) (Jersey) Law 1948, Art 15

 

Maximum:        3 months imprisonment and a Level 2 fine (£1,000).

 

May not disqualify or endorse

 

A. Identify the appropriate starting point

Starting points based on first time offender pleading guilty

Examples of nature of activity

Starting point

Range

A

 Driver or owner fails to produce certificate

£350

£100 - £500

 

B. Consider the effect of aggravating and mitigating factors

(other than those within examples above)

The following may be particularly relevant, but these lists are not exhaustive

Factor indicating higher culpability

  1. Vehicle being driven for hire or reward
  2. Vehicle carrying passengers

Factor indicating lower culpability

  1. Believed owner/driver (as the case may be) had already produced
  2. Driver did not have access to insurance certificate

 

Form a preliminary view of the appropriate sentence,
then consider offender mitigation


 

23​

Falsification and wrongful use of insurance certificates or discs

Motor Traffic (Third Party Insurance) (Jersey) Law 1948, Art 18

 

Maximum:        Art 18(1): 2 years imprisonment and/or a fine

                        Art 18(2) and (3):  6 months imprisonment and/or a fine

 

May not disqualify or endorse

 

A. Identify the appropriate starting point

Starting points based on first time offender pleading guilty

Examples of nature of activity

Starting point

Range

A

Makes a false statement to obtain insurance certificate or disc - Art 18(2)

2 months

£1,000 – 4 months

B

Issues certificate or disc knowing it has a false particular - Art 18(3)

2 months

£1,000 – 4 months

C

With intent to deceive, makes, alters, uses, lends or allows, a certificate or disc - Art 18(1)

4 months

£2,000 – 8 months

 

B. Consider the effect of aggravating and mitigating factors

(other than those within examples above)

The following may be particularly relevant, but these lists are not exhaustive

Factor indicating higher culpability

  1. Engaged in insurance business
  2. Commercial benefit
  3. Cover invalidated
  4. Financial gain

Factor indicating lower culpability

  1. The error did not invalidate cover
  2. The false statement was made without intent to deceive (Band A only)

Factor indicating greater degree of harm

  1. ​Accident with damage and/or injury

 

 

Form a preliminary view of the appropriate sentence,
then consider offender mitigation

 

24​

Holding a telephone whilst driving when vehicle in motion

Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956, Art 50

 

Maximum:        Level 2 fine (£1,000)

 

May disqualify or endorse

 

A. Identify the appropriate starting point

Starting points based on first time offender pleading guilty

Examples of nature of activity

Starting point

Range

Disqualify/

Endorse

A

Holding a telephone and driving

£450

£350 - £650

Consider/ Yes

 

B. Consider the effect of aggravating and mitigating factors

(other than those within examples above)

The following may be particularly relevant, but these lists are not exhaustive

Factor indicating higher culpability

  1. Driving for hire or reward
  2. Carrying passengers
  3. HGV
  4. Built up area

Factor indicating lower culpability

  1. ​Urgent phone call, e.g. from child

Factor indicating greater degree of harm

  1. High volume of traffic, including pedestrians
  2. Long distance driven
  3. Evidence of impact on driving

Factor indicating lesser degree of harm

  1. Low volume of traffic
  2. Short distance driven

 

Form a preliminary view of the appropriate sentence,
then consider offender mitigation

 

Consider endorsement and disqualification

 

Note

 

There is a presumption in favour of disqualification where a previous warning has been given or where there is a previous conviction.

25

Failure to comply with the conditions of a provisional licence

Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956, Art 11

 

Maximum:        Level 2 fine (£1,000)

 

May disqualify or endorse

 

A. Identify the appropriate starting point

Starting points based on first time offender pleading guilty

Examples of nature of activity

Starting point

Range

Disqualify/Endorse

A

Not displaying “L” plates

£200

£100 - £300

No

B

Not supervised by qualified licence holder

£400

£300 - £500

6 months

C

Not supervised by any licence holder

£500

£400 - £600

6 months

 

B. Consider the effect of aggravating and mitigating factors

(other than those within examples above)

The following may be particularly relevant, but these lists are not exhaustive

Factor indicating higher culpability

  1. Evidence of poor driving
  2. Carrying passengers
  3. Distance driven
  4. Evidence of sustained unsupervised driving

Factor indicating lower culpability

  1. ​Genuine emergency

Factor indicating greater degree of harm

  1. ​Accident with damage and/or injury

Factor indicating lesser degree of harm

 

 

Form a preliminary view of the appropriate sentence,
then consider offender mitigation

 

Consider endorsement and disqualification

​ 

26

False or misleading declarations / failure to notify change in registration documents

Motor Vehicle Registration (Jersey) Law 1993

Art 11(1) (false declaration)

Art 11(2) (failure to notify)

 

Maximum:

Art 11 (1) – 6 months imprisonment or Level 2 fine (£1,000)

Art 11 (2) – Level 2 fine (£1,000)

 

A. Identify the appropriate starting point

Starting points based on first time offender pleading guilty

 

Examples of nature of activity

Starting point

Range

A

Failure to notify change of address - Art 11(2)

£250

£100 - £400

B

Failure to notify substantive change to vehicle – Art 11(2)

£300

£200 - £400

C

False or misleading statement made knowingly – Art 11(1)

£600

£400 – 4 months

 

B. Consider the effect of aggravating and mitigating factors

(other than those within examples above)

The following may be particularly relevant, but these lists are not exhaustive

Factor indicating higher culpability

  1. Information related to safety of vehicle
  2. Long time since change was notifiable
  3. Modification to avoid detection

Factor indicating lower culpability

  1. ​Brief omission

Factor indicating greater degree of harm

  1. Modification created danger
  2. Failure to notify impacted upon investigations into other offence
  3. Third party loss

Factor indicating lesser degree of harm

 

 

Form a preliminary view of the appropriate sentence, then consider offender mitigation


 

27

Failure to wear a seatbelt

Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956,

Art 41(3) (adult)

Art 42(2) (child under 14)

 

Maximum:        Level 2 fine (£1,000)

 

May not disqualify or endorse

 

A. Identify the appropriate starting point

Starting points based on first time offender pleading guilty

 

Examples of nature of activity

Starting point

Range

Adult

£200

£100 - £400

Child passenger

£300

£200 - £600

 

B. Consider the effect of aggravating and mitigating factors

(other than those within examples above)

The following may be particularly relevant, but these lists are not exhaustive

 

Factor indicating higher culpability

  1. Long distance driven
  2. High speed driving

Factor indicating lower culpability

  1. ​Short distance driven

Factor indicating greater degree of harm

  1. ​Accident involved

 

 

Form a preliminary view of the appropriate sentence,
then consider offender mitigation


 

28

Speeding

Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956 Art 21

 

Road Traffic (Speed Limits) (Jersey) Order 2003

Art 2 (30 mph speed limit),

Art 3 (20 mph speed limit),

Art 4 (15 mph speed limit)

 

Maximum:        Level 2 fine (£1,000)

 

May endorse or disqualify.  May order retest on disqualification

 

A. Identify the appropriate starting point

Starting points based on first time offender pleading guilty

 

 

Speed above limit (in mph)

Fine

 

A

5 - 19

£100 - £300

Endorse

B

20 and above

£300 - £650

Disqualify up to 12 months

 


B. Consider the effect of aggravating and mitigating factors

(other than those within examples above)

The following may be particularly relevant, but these lists are not exhaustive

Factor indicating higher culpability

  1. Poor road or weather conditions
  2. Physical nature of the road
  3. LGV, HGV, PSV etc.
  4. Towing caravan/trailer (NB 30 mph limit)
  5. Carrying passengers or heavy load
  6. Driving for hire or reward
  7. Evidence of unacceptable standard of driving over and above speed

Factor indicating lower culpability

  1. ​​Genuine emergency established

Factor indicating greater degree of harm

  1. Location e.g. near school
  2. High level of traffic or pedestrians, especially children or the elderly, in the vicinity

 

 

Form a preliminary view of the appropriate sentence,
then consider offender mitigation

 

Consider endorsement and disqualification – may order retest

 

Note

Aggravating features might raise the starting point to B.

29

Tampering with a motor vehicle

Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956, Art 54(2)

 

Maximum:        Article 54(1) moving vehicle: Level 3 fine (£10,000)

Article 54(2) gets on to or tampers with stationery vehicle: Level 2 fine (£1,000)

Article 54(2) May disqualify or endorse

 

A. Identify the appropriate starting point

Starting points based on first time offender pleading guilty

Examples of nature of activity

Starting point

Range

Disqualify/

Endorse

A

Tampers with any mechanism or gets onto the vehicle where no entry gained to vehicle and no damage caused

£300

£200 - £300

No

B

Entering vehicle, little or no damage caused

£400

£300 - £500

Consider

C

Tampering with or entering vehicle, with damage caused

£500

£400 - £600

Consider

D

Article 54(1)

£2,500

£1,500 - £6,000

Not available

 

B. Consider the effect of aggravating and mitigating factors

(other than those within examples above)

The following may be particularly relevant, but these lists are not exhaustive

 

Factor indicating higher culpability

  1. Vehicle in dark/isolated location

 

Factor indicating greater degree of harm

  1. Emergency services vehicle
  2. Disabled driver’s vehicle
  3. Renders vehicle unfit to be driven
  4. Part of a series of incidents

 

 

Form a preliminary view of the appropriate sentence, then consider offender mitigation

 

Consider endorsement and disqualification (Article 54(2))

30​​

Neglect of traffic directions

Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956

Art 74(1)(a) (traffic light or controller)

Art 74(1)(b) (other sign)

 

Maximum:        Level 2 fine (£1,000)

May disqualify or endorse

 

A. Identify the appropriate starting point

Starting points based on first time offender pleading guilty

Examples of nature of activity

Starting point

Range

Disqualify/

Endorse

 

A

Driving created no risk of injury or damage

£250

£200 - £300

No/ Yes

B

Driving caused risk of injury and some damage

£350

£300 - £400

Consider/Yes

C

Driving caused injury or substantial damage

£500

£400 - £600

Yes 1 – 6 months/Yes

 

B. Consider the effect of aggravating and mitigating factors

(other than those within examples above)

The following may be particularly relevant, but these lists are not exhaustive

Factor indicating higher culpability

  1. Volume of traffic
  2. Road and weather conditions
  3. Speed of travel

 

Factor indicating greater degree of harm

  1. Evasive action needed by other road users

Factor indicating lesser degree of harm

  1. Gave assistance to injured person

 

Form a preliminary view of the appropriate sentence,
then consider offender mitigation

 

Consider endorsement and disqualification if Article 54(2)

 

Note

The Court will be alert to double-counting if, for example, there is also a careless/dangerous driving charge.

31​

​Taking a vehicle without owner’s cons​ent or other authority

Road Traffic (Jersey) Law 1956, Art 53

 

Maximum (motor vehicle):

First offence – 6 months imprisonment or a fine

Second offence – 3 years imprisonment and/or a fine

 

May disqualify or endorse.

 

A. Identify the appropriate starting point

Starting points based on first time offender pleading guilty

Examples of nature of activity

Starting point

Range

Disqualify/

Endorse

A

Exceeding authorised use e.g. employer’s or relative’s vehicle, without damage to vehicle

£1,000

£500 - £1,500

Consider/Yes

B

Taking vehicle without any authorization with/without causing damage

2 months

£2,000 – 3 months

Disqualify 6-12 months

C

Taking vehicle without any authorization and causing serious damage or injury

4 months

3 – 5 months

Disqualify 12+ months

 

 

B. Consider the effect of aggravating and mitigating factors

(other than those within examples above)

The following may be particularly relevant, but these lists are not exhaustive

Factor indicating higher culpability

  1. Driver uninsured
  2. Driver unlicensed
  3. Evidence of bad driving/accident
  4. Taking from private premises
  5. Causing damage to other vehicles or property
  6. Causing injury
  7. Distance driven

Factor indicating lower culpability

  1. Misunderstanding with owner
  2. Vehicle only driven on private property
  3. Only a passenger, not involved in initial taking

Factor indicating greater degree of harm

  1. Vehicle belonging to vulnerable person
  2. Emergency services vehicle
  3. Medium to large goods vehicle
  4. Passengers carried

Factor indicating lesser degree of harm

  1. Offender voluntarily returned vehicle to owner
  2. Vehicle undamaged

 

Form a preliminary view of the appropriate sentence,
then consider offender mitigation

 

Consider endorsement and disqualification

 

Notes

  1. ​These offences will often also involve a charge of using without insurance.  This has not been factored into the above penalties, therefore always cross check the insurance guideline and make the necessary adjustments to reflect the totality of the offending.
  2. Offences not involving motor vehicles are obviously less serious and would normally be dealt with by a fine in a range from £400 to £1,000.  Note, however, that on a second or subsequent conviction a custodial sentence of up to 12 months imprisonment is available.​​​

Page Last Updated: 10 Oct 2024