
Bankruptcy
(Netting, Contractual Subordination and Non-Petition Provisions)
(Jersey) Law 2005
A LAW relating to the enforcement of
netting, contractual subordination and non-petition provisions of agreements.
Commencement [see endnotes]
1 Interpretation
In this Law –
“agreement” includes –
(a) an
agreement between more than 2 parties;
(b) a
series of inter-related agreements between the same parties (whether pursuant
to a master netting agreement or otherwise); and
(c) an
agreement made between parties whether or not acting through multiple branches
and whether operated through a clearing house system or otherwise;
“bankruptcy” includes any procedure analogous to
bankruptcy or any similar procedure under any applicable law;
“close-out netting provision”, in respect of an
agreement, means so much of the agreement as relates to –
(a) there
ceasing to be any time allowed for the performance of an obligation specified
in the agreement on the occurrence of an event specified in the agreement
(including its automatic termination);
(b) an
obligation of the agreement to pay a specified amount but not immediately
becoming an obligation to pay an amount determined pursuant to the agreement; or
(c) any
combination of the matters mentioned in paragraphs (a) and (b),
whether through the operation of netting or otherwise;
“contractual subordination”, in respect of an agreement,
means the subordination or other deferral of all or any part of the claim of a
party to the agreement against a debtor of that party to the claim of any other
creditor of the debtor;
“contractual subordination provision”, in respect of an
agreement, means so much of the agreement as relates to contractual
subordination;
“netting”, in respect of an agreement, means the
conversion, into one net claim or one net obligation, of all claims and
obligations arising under the agreement to the effect that only that net claim
can be demanded or that net obligation is owed;
“non-petition provision”, in respect of an agreement,
means so much of the agreement –
(a) that
relates to a party to the agreement not taking any action to have a person
declared bankrupt; or
(b) that
limits the circumstances under which a party to the agreement may take any
action to have a person declared bankrupt;
“obligation” means an obligation of any type, including
an obligation to deliver property;
“set-off provision”, in respect of an agreement, means
so much of the agreement, other than a close-out netting provision in the
agreement, as relates to the netting of amounts due from one party to the
agreement to any other party to it.
2 Close-out
netting, set-off and contractual subordination provisions to be enforceable
(1) Despite any enactment
or rule of law to the contrary –
(a) a
close-out netting provision of an agreement;
(b) a
set-off provision of an agreement; or
(c) a
contractual subordination provision of an agreement,
is enforceable in accordance with its terms.
(2) A provision mentioned
in paragraph (1) remains enforceable despite –
(a) the
bankruptcy of a party to the agreement or of any other person; and
(b) the
lack of any mutuality of obligation between a party to the agreement and any
other person.
(3) Accordingly, any person
dealing with the affairs of the bankrupt party or person shall, when dealing
with the property of that party or person, give effect to any relevant
provision of the type mentioned in paragraph (1).
(4) The provision shall be
enforceable against –
(a) the
parties to the agreement;
(b) any
guarantor or any person providing security for a party to the agreement; and
(c) any
creditor of a party to the agreement.
(5) Where this Article
applies, any authority or mandate to implement a provision mentioned in
paragraph (1), or Article 4(2) or (3) is not revoked by the
bankruptcy of the person who gave the authority or mandate or of any other
person.
3 Non-petition
provisions to be enforceable
(1) A non-petition
provision of an agreement is enforceable in accordance with its terms.
(2) A provision mentioned
in paragraph (1) remains enforceable despite –
(a) the
bankruptcy of a party to the agreement or of any other person; and
(b) the
lack of any mutuality of obligation between a party to the agreement and any
other person.
(3) Accordingly, the Royal
Court shall refuse to grant any application which, if granted, would be
inconsistent with the provision.
(4) A reference in this Law
to a provision mentioned in paragraph (1) shall be taken to
include –
(a) any
provision ancillary to the provision; and
(b) any
provision necessary to implement the provision in accordance with the other
provisions of the agreement.
4 Other
provisions enforceable despite bankruptcy
(1) Where an agreement
contains a provision of a type mentioned in Article 2(1) any further
provision of the agreement of the type mentioned in paragraph (2) or
paragraph (3) is enforceable and remains enforceable despite –
(a) the
bankruptcy of a party to the agreement or of any other person; and
(b) the
lack of any mutuality of obligation between a party to the agreement and any
other person.
(2) The further provisions
mentioned in paragraph (1) are provisions by which the parties to the
agreement agree –
(a) on a
system or mechanism to be used to convert a non-financial obligation into a
monetary obligation of an equivalent value;
(b) on a
system or mechanism to be used to value a non-financial obligation for netting
purposes;
(c) on
the rate of exchange or the method to be used to establish a rate of exchange
to be applied for netting purposes when the sums to be netted are in different
currencies;
(d) on
the method to be used to establish the currency in which payment of a net sum
is to be effected; or
(e) that
certain transactions or other dealings or a type or class of transactions or
dealings carried out pursuant to the agreement are to be treated as a single
transaction or dealing for netting purposes.
(3) The further provisions
mentioned in paragraph (1) also include –
(a) provisions
ancillary to those mentioned in paragraph (2); and
(b) provisions
necessary for a close-out netting provision, set-off provision or contractual
subordination provision to be implemented in accordance with the other
provisions of the agreement.
5 Fraud
and misrepresentation
(1) This Article
applies –
(a) to a
netting, contractual subordination or non-petition provision of an agreement;
and
(b) a
provision mentioned in Article 4(2) and (3).
(2) Nothing in this
Law –
(a) affects
the application of any enactment or rule of law that renders a provision to
which this Article applies unenforceable, in a particular case, on the grounds
of fraud or misrepresentation; or
(b) affects
the enforceability of a provision of an agreement that provides that a
provision to which this Article applies shall be void in the event of fraud or
misrepresentation.
6 Law
to prevail in respect of bodies corporate established outside Jersey
(1) This Article applies
to –
(a) a
close-out netting provision;
(b) a
contractual subordination provision;
(c) a
non-petition provision;
(d) a
set-off provision; and
(e) a
provision of the type mentioned in Article 4(2) and (3),
contained in an agreement where one of the parties to the agreement
is a branch in Jersey of a body corporate established outside Jersey.
(2) The provision shall be
valid and enforceable in accordance with this Law despite any other enactment
or rule of law that may be applicable to the body corporate, including the law
of the jurisdiction under which it is established.
7 Citation
This Law may be cited as the Bankruptcy (Netting, Contractual
Subordination and Non-Petition Provisions) (Jersey) Law 2005.