Proceeds of Crime
(Jersey) Law 1999[1]
A LAW to provide for the confiscation and forfeiture of the proceeds of crime,
to establish new offences of money laundering and new procedures to forestall,
prevent and detect money laundering, and to enable the enforcement in Jersey of
overseas confiscation orders, and for connected purposes[2]
Commencement
[see endnotes]
PART 1
INTRODUCTORY
1 Interpretation
(1) In
this Law, unless the context otherwise requires –
“Commission” and “Financial Services Commission” mean the
Jersey Financial Services Commission established by Article 2 of the Financial Services Commission (Jersey)
Law 1998;[3]
“competent authority” means a competent
authority for the purposes of Article 3(3) of the Investigation of Fraud (Jersey) Law 1991;[4]
“confiscation order” means an order made
under Article 3, and also means any order under that Article that is made
by virtue of Article 9, 12 or 13;
“Court” means the Royal Court;
“criminal conduct” means conduct, whether
occurring before or after Article 3 comes into force, that –
(a) constitutes an offence specified in Schedule
1; or
(b) if it occurs or has occurred outside Jersey,
would have constituted such an offence if occurring in Jersey;
“criminal
investigation” means an investigation which police officers or other
persons have a duty to conduct for the purpose of ascertaining whether a person
should be charged with an offence specified in Schedule 1 or, in a
jurisdiction outside Jersey, with an equivalent offence;
“Criminal Offences Confiscations Fund” and
“Fund” mean the Criminal
Offences Confiscations Fund established under Article 24;
“defendant” means a person against whom
proceedings have been instituted for an offence specified in Schedule 1
(whether or not he or she has been convicted);
“designated customs officer”
means an officer of the Impôts who is designated under
Article 34E(2) or, if no one is for the time being designated, the Agent
of the Impôts;
“designated police
officer” means a police officer who is designated under
Article 34E(1) or, if no one is for the time being designated, the Chief
Officer of the States of Jersey Police Force;
“drug trafficking”
has the same meaning as is given to that expression by Article 1(1) of the
Misuse of Drugs (Jersey) Law 1978[5];
“exported”, in relation to any money,
includes its being brought to any place in Jersey for the purpose of being
exported;
“external confiscation order” means an order
made by a court in a country or territory outside Jersey –
(a) for the purpose of recovering property
obtained as a result of or in connection with conduct corresponding to an
offence specified in Schedule 1;
(b) for the purpose of recovering the value of
the property so obtained; or
(c) for the purpose of depriving a person of a
pecuniary advantage so obtained;
“financial services
business” means a business specified, or of a description specified, in
Schedule 2;
“gift caught by Part 2” and “gift caught by this Part” have the meaning
given in Article 2(9);
“interest”, in relation to property,
includes right;
“investigation”, in relation to crime,
includes the prevention of crime and also includes the detection of crime;
“making a gift” has the meaning given in Article 2(10);
“modifications” includes additions,
alterations and omissions;
“money” means cash (that is to say, coins or
notes in any currency) or any negotiable instrument;
“money laundering”
means –
(a) conduct which is an offence under any
provision of Articles 30 and 31 of this Law or of Articles 15
and 16 of the Terrorism (Jersey) Law 2002[6]; or
(b) conduct outside Jersey which, if occurring
in Jersey, would be an offence specified in sub-paragraph (a);
“police officer” means a member of the
Honorary Police, a member of the States of Jersey Police Force, the Agent of
the Impôts or any other officer of the Impôts;
“proceeds of criminal conduct”, in relation
to any person who has benefited from criminal conduct, means that benefit;
“property” means all property, whether movable or immovable,
or vested or contingent, and whether in Jersey or elsewhere, including –
(a) any legal document or instrument evidencing
title to or interest in any such property;
(b) any interest in or power in respect of any
such property;
(c) in relation to movable property, any right,
including a right to possession,
and for the avoidance of doubt, a
reference in this Law to property being obtained by a person includes a
reference to any interest in that property being obtained;
“realisable property” has the meaning given
in Article 2(1) and (2);
“saisie
judiciaire” means an order to which Article 16(1) refers;
“value of a gift” has the meaning given in Article 2(7)
and (8);
“value of property” has the meaning given in
Article 2(4), (5) and (6);
“virtual currency”
has the meaning given in Schedule 2, Part B, paragraph 4(4).[7]
(2) For
the purposes of this Law –
(a) references to property obtained, or to a
pecuniary advantage derived, in connection with the commission of an offence or
with criminal conduct include a reference to property obtained or to a
pecuniary advantage derived both in that connection and in some other
connection; and
(b) where a person derives a pecuniary advantage
as a result of or in connection with the commission of an offence or with
criminal conduct, the person is to be treated as if the person had obtained as
a result of or in connection with the commission of that offence, or that
conduct, a sum of money equal to the value of the pecuniary advantage.
(2A) For
the purposes of this Law –
(a) a person benefits from any criminal conduct
if that person obtains property as a result of or in connection with the
conduct; and
(b) in particular, but without derogation from
sub-paragraph (a), a person benefits from criminal conduct if the person
receives any payment or other reward in connection with such conduct, whether
carried on by that person or by another.[8]
(2B) For
the purposes of Part 2, “relevant criminal conduct”, in
relation to a defendant, means the offences for which the defendant appears to
be sentenced, together with any other offences which the Court may take into consideration
in sentencing the defendant.[9]
(3) For
the purposes of Part 2, proceedings for an offence are instituted in Jersey –
(a) when the Bailiff issues a warrant in respect
of the offence for the arrest of a person who is out of Jersey;
(b) when a person is arrested and charged with
the offence;
(c) when a summons in respect of the offence is
served on a person at the instance of the Attorney General; or
(d) when a summons in respect of the offence is
served on a person in accordance with Article 9 of the Magistrate’s Court (Miscellaneous
Provisions) (Jersey) Law 1949,[10]
and where the application of this
paragraph would result in there being more than one time for the institution of
proceedings, they shall be taken to have been instituted at the earliest of
those times.
(4) For
the purposes of Part 2, proceedings in Jersey for an offence are
concluded –
(a) when the defendant is acquitted of that
offence and of all other counts (if any) on which the defendant is also tried
at the same time;
(b) if the defendant is convicted on one or more
counts but the Court decides not to make a confiscation order against the
defendant, when it makes that decision; or
(c) if a confiscation order is made against the
defendant in those proceedings, when the order is satisfied.
(5) An
application under Article 9, 12 or 13 is concluded –
(a) if the Court decides not to make a
confiscation order against the defendant, when it makes that decision; or
(b) if a confiscation order is made against the
defendant as a result of that application, when the order is satisfied.
(6) An
application under Article 14 or 19 is concluded –
(a) if the Court decides not to vary the
confiscation order in question, when it makes that decision; or
(b) if it varies the confiscation order as a
result of the application, when the order is satisfied.
(7) For
the purposes of Part 2, a confiscation order is satisfied when no amount is due
under it.
(8) For
the purposes of Part 2, an order is subject to appeal until (disregarding any
power of a court to grant leave to appeal out of time) there is no further
possibility of an appeal on which the order could be varied or set aside.
(9) The
States may amend paragraph (1) by Regulations.[11]
2 Meanings of expressions
relating to realisable property
(1) In
Part 2, “realisable property” means –
(a) any property held by the defendant;
(b) any property held by a person to whom the
defendant has directly or indirectly made a gift caught by Part 2; and
(c) any property to which the defendant is
beneficially entitled.
(2) However,
property is not realisable property if an order under Article 29 of the
Misuse of Drugs (Jersey) Law 1978[12], Article 27 of the Terrorism (Jersey) Law 2002[13] or Article 9 of the Proceeds of Crime (Cash Seizure) (Jersey)
Law 2008 is in force in respect of the property.[14]
(3) For
the purposes of Part 2, the amount that might be realised at the time a
confiscation order is made is the total of the values at that time of all the
realisable property, including –
(a) the total value of any property to which the
defendant is beneficially entitled, less –
(i) any
amount due in respect of a fine or other order of the Court or the Court of
Appeal or the Magistrate’s Court or the Youth Court, imposed or made on
conviction for an offence, where the fine was imposed or the order was made
before the making of the confiscation order,
(ii) any
sum in respect of which the person to whom it is due would, if the defendant
had become bankrupt before the making of the confiscation order, be entitled to
claim preference (“préférence”)
or privilege (“privilège”),
as the case may be,
(iii) any
sum the payment of which is secured on all or any of the realisable property by
a simple conventional hypothec or a judicial hypothec created in accordance
with the Loi (1880) sur la Propriété
Foncière[15] before the making of the confiscation order, and
(iv) any
sum the payment of which is secured on all or any of the realisable property by
a security interest created before the making of the confiscation order, being
a continuing security interest to which, as referred to in Article 1A of
the Security Interests (Jersey) Law 1983[16], that Law applies or a security interest within the meaning of the
Security Interests (Jersey) Law 2012[17]; and
(b) the total of the values at that time of all
gifts caught by Part 2.[18]
(4) Subject
to the following provisions of this Article, for the purposes of Part 2 the
value of property (other than cash) in relation to any person holding the
property means the market value of the property.
(5) References
in Part 2 to the value at any time (referred to in paragraph (6) as the
“material time”) of any property obtained by a person as a result
of or in connection with an offence are references to –
(a) the value of the property to the person when
the person obtained it, adjusted to take account of subsequent changes in the
value of money; or
(b) where paragraph (6) applies, the value
there mentioned,
whichever is greater.
(6) If
at the material time the person holds –
(a) the property that the person obtained (not
being cash); or
(b) property that, in whole or in part, directly
or indirectly represents in the person’s hands the property that the
person obtained,
the value referred to in paragraph (5)(b)
is the value to the person at the material time of the property mentioned in sub-paragraph (a)
of this paragraph or (as the case may be) the property mentioned in sub-paragraph (b)
of this paragraph so far as it so represents the property that the person
obtained.
(7) Subject
to paragraph (10), references in Part 2 to the value at any time (referred
to in paragraph (8) as the “material time”) of a gift caught
by Part 2 are references to –
(a) the value of the gift to the recipient when
he or she received it, adjusted to take account of subsequent changes in the
value of money; or
(b) where paragraph (8) applies, the value
there mentioned,
whichever is greater.
(8) Subject
to paragraph (10), if at the material time the person holds –
(a) the property that he or she received (not
being cash); or
(b) property that, in whole or in part, directly
or indirectly represents in his or her hands the property that he or she
received,
the value referred to in paragraph (7)(b)
is the value to him or her at the material time of the property mentioned in sub-paragraph (a)
of this paragraph or (as the case may be) sub-paragraph (b) of this paragraph
so far as it so represents the property that he or she received.
(9) A
gift (including a gift made before the commencement of this Article) is caught
by Part 2 if –
(a) it was made by the defendant at any time
after the commission of the offence or, if more than one, the earliest of the
offences to which the proceedings for the time being relate; and
(b) the Court considers it appropriate in all
the circumstances to take the gift into account,
and for the purposes of this paragraph
an offence to which the proceedings for the time being relate includes, where
the proceedings have resulted in the conviction of the defendant, a reference
to any offence that the Court takes into consideration when determining his or
her sentence.
(10) For
the purposes of Part 2 –
(a) the circumstances in which the defendant is
to be treated as making a gift include those where the defendant transfers
property to another person directly or indirectly for a value that is
significantly less than the value provided by the defendant; and
(b) in those circumstances, the preceding
provisions of this Article shall apply as if the defendant had made a gift of
such share in the property as bears to the whole property the same proportion
as the difference between the values referred to in sub-paragraph (a)
bears to the value provided by the defendant.
(11) The
States may amend this Article (except this paragraph) by Regulations.[19]
PART 2
CONFISCATION ORDERS
3 Confiscation orders
(1) Where
a defendant appears before the Court to be sentenced in respect of one or more
offences specified in Schedule 1, and the defendant has not previously been
sentenced or otherwise dealt with in respect of his or her conviction for the
offence or (as the case may be) any of the offences concerned –
(a) if the Attorney General asks the Court to
proceed under this Article; or
(b) if the Court considers that, even though the
Attorney General has not asked it to do so, it is appropriate for it to proceed
under this Article,
the Court may act in accordance
with this Article.
(2) However,
this Article shall not apply in the case of any proceedings against any
defendant where the defendant is convicted in those proceedings of an offence
that was committed before this Article comes into force.
(3) Where
the Court is proceeding under this Article, it may first determine whether the
defendant has benefited from any relevant criminal conduct.
(4) If
the Court determines that the defendant has so benefited it may, before
sentencing or otherwise dealing with the defendant in respect of the offence or
(as the case may be) any of the offences concerned –
(a) determine in accordance with Article 4
the amount to be recovered in the defendant’s case by virtue of this Article;
and
(b) make a confiscation order, to the effect
that the defendant pay that amount.
(5) Where
the Court makes a confiscation order –
(a) it shall take account of the order
before –
(i) imposing
any fine on the defendant,
(ii) making
any order involving any payment by the defendant, or
(iii) making
any forfeiture order under Article 29 of the Misuse of Drugs (Jersey) Law
1978, Article 27 of the Terrorism (Jersey) Law 2002 or Article 9 of
the Proceeds of Crime (Cash Seizure) (Jersey) Law 2008[20]; and
(b) subject to sub-paragraph (a), it shall
leave the order out of account in determining the appropriate sentence or other
manner of dealing with the defendant in the proceedings.[21]
(6) No
enactment restricting the power of a court dealing with an offender in a
particular way from dealing with the offender also in any other way shall by
reason only of the making of an order under this Article restrict the Court
from dealing with an offender in any way that the Court considers appropriate
in respect of an offence specified in Schedule 1.
(7) Where –
(a) the Court makes both a confiscation order
and an order for the payment of compensation under Article 2 of the Criminal Justice (Compensation Orders) (Jersey)
Law 1994[22] against the same person in the same proceedings; and
(b) it appears to the Court that the person will
not have sufficient means to satisfy both the orders in full,
it shall direct that so much of
the compensation as will not in its opinion be recoverable because of the
insufficiency of the person’s means shall be paid out of any sums
recovered under the confiscation order.
(8) The
standard of proof required to determine any question arising under this Law as
to –
(a) whether a person has benefited from any
offence; or
(b) the amount to be recovered in the
person’s case by virtue of this Article,
shall be that applicable in civil
proceedings.
(9) The
States may amend Schedule 1 by Regulations, by adding, deleting or substituting
any offence.[23]
4 Amount
to be recovered under confiscation order[24]
(1) Subject
to paragraphs (2) and (3), the amount which a defendant is required by a
confiscation order to pay (in this Article, “the penalty”) shall be
the amount assessed by the Court to be the value of the defendant’s
benefit from the relevant criminal conduct (in paragraph (2), the “assessed
value”).
(2) Where
the Court is satisfied that the amount which might be realised at the time when
the confiscation order is made is less than the assessed value, the penalty
shall be the amount which appears to the Court might be so realised (or, if
that amount is nil, a nominal amount).
(3) Where
the Court is satisfied that a victim of the relevant criminal conduct has
instituted or intends to institute civil proceedings against the defendant in
respect of loss, injury or damage sustained in connection with that conduct,
the penalty may be of such lesser amount as the Court thinks fit.
5 Confiscation order relating
to a course of relevant criminal conduct
(1) This
Article applies for the purposes of Article 3 where a defendant appears
before the Court to be sentenced in respect of one or more qualifying
offences –
(a) if the Attorney General asks the Court to
apply it for the purposes of that Article; or
(b) if the Court considers that, even though the
Attorney General has not asked it to do so, it is appropriate for it to do so,
and either the defendant is
convicted in the proceedings of at least 2 qualifying offences (including the
offence in question) or the defendant has been convicted of a qualifying
offence on at least one previous occasion during the relevant period.
(2) An
offence is a qualifying offence for the purposes of this Part if it is an
offence in respect of which all of the following conditions are satisfied,
namely –
(a) it is an offence specified in Schedule 1;
(b) it is an offence committed after this Article
comes into force; and
(c) the Court is satisfied that it is an offence
from which the defendant has benefited.
(3) The
relevant period for the purposes of this Article, in relation to a defendant,
is the period of 6 years ending when the proceedings in which this Article
applies were instituted against the defendant.
(4) When
this Article applies for the purposes of Article 3, the Court may if it
thinks fit (but subject to paragraph (6)) make the assumptions in paragraph (5)
for the purpose –
(a) of determining whether the defendant has
benefited from relevant criminal conduct; and
(b) if the defendant has, of assessing the value
of the defendant’s benefit from such conduct.
(5) Those
assumptions are –
(a) that any property appearing to the Court to
be held by the defendant at any time since the date of the defendant’s
conviction, or appearing to the Court to have been transferred to the defendant
at any time since the beginning of the relevant period –
(i) was
received by the defendant at the earliest time when he or she appears to the
Court to have held it, and
(ii) was
received by the defendant as a result of or in connection with the commission
of offences specified in Schedule 1;
(b) that any of the defendant’s
expenditure since the beginning of the relevant period was met out of payments
received by the defendant as a result of or in connection with the commission
of offences specified in Schedule 1; and
(c) for the purposes of valuing any property
that the defendant had or is assumed to have had at any time, that the
defendant received the property free of any other interests in it.
(6) The
Court shall not make an assumption in paragraph (5) in respect of any
particular property or expenditure –
(a) if the assumption, so far as it relates to
that property or expenditure, is shown to be incorrect;
(b) if the assumption, so far as it relates to
that property or expenditure, is shown to be correct in respect of an offence
from which the defendant’s benefit has been the subject of a previous
confiscation order; or
(c) if the Court is satisfied that, for any
other reason, there would be a serious risk of injustice if the assumption were
made in respect of that property or expenditure.
(7) Where
the assumptions in paragraph (5) are made the offences from which, in
accordance with those assumptions, the defendant is found to have benefited
shall be treated as if they were comprised, for the purposes of this Part, in
the conduct that is to be treated as relevant criminal conduct by the
defendant.
(8) In
this Article, the “date of the defendant’s conviction”
means –
(a) in a case not falling within sub-paragraph (b),
the date on which the defendant is convicted of the offence in question; and
(b) where the defendant is convicted of that
offence and one or more other offences in the proceedings in question, and
those convictions are not all on the same date, the date of the latest of those
convictions.
6 Postponed determinations
(1) Where
the Court is acting under Article 3 but considers that it requires further
information before –
(a) determining whether the defendant has
benefited from any relevant criminal conduct; or
(b) determining the amount to be recovered in the
defendant’s case by virtue of Article 3,
it may, for the purposes of
enabling that information to be obtained, postpone the making of the
determination for such period as it may specify.
(2) More
than one postponement may be made under paragraph (1) in relation to the
same case.
(3) Unless
it is satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances, the Court shall not
specify a period that –
(a) by itself; or
(b) where there have been one or more previous
postponements under paragraph (1) or (4), when taken together with the
earlier specified period or periods,
exceeds 6 months beginning with
the date of conviction.
(4) Where
the defendant appeals against his or her conviction, the Court may on that
account –
(a) postpone the making of either or both of the
determinations mentioned in paragraph (1) for such period as it may
specify; or
(b) where it has already exercised its powers
under this Article to postpone, extend the specified period.
(5) A
postponement or extension under paragraph (1) or (4) may be
made –
(a) on application by the defendant or the
Attorney General; or
(b) by the Court of its own motion.
(6) Unless
the Court is satisfied that there are exceptional circumstances, any
postponement or extension under paragraph (4) shall not exceed the period
ending 3 months after the date on which the appeal is determined or otherwise
disposed of.
(7) Where
the Court exercises its power under paragraph (1) or (4), it may
nevertheless proceed to sentence or otherwise deal with the defendant in
respect of the offence or any of the offences concerned.
(8) Where
the Court has so proceeded, it may determine in accordance with Article 4
the amount to be recovered in the case of the defendant by virtue of Article 3
and make a confiscation order under Article 3, notwithstanding that the defendant
has been sentenced or otherwise dealt with already.
(9) In
sentencing or otherwise dealing with the defendant in respect of the offence
concerned, or any of the offences concerned, at any time during the specified
period, the Court shall not –
(a) impose any fine on the defendant; or
(b) make any order mentioned in Article 3(5)(a).
(10) Where
the Court has sentenced the defendant under paragraph (7) of this Article
during the specified period it may, after the end of that period, vary the
sentence by imposing a fine or making any order mentioned in Article 3(5)(a),
so long as it does so within 28 days after the specified period.
(11) In
this Article the “date of conviction” means –
(a) in a case not falling within sub-paragraph (b),
the date on which the defendant was convicted; or
(b) where the defendant was convicted, in the
same proceedings but on different dates, of 2 or more offences that are
comprised in relevant criminal conduct, the date of the latest of those
convictions.
7 Statements
relating to criminal offences
(1) Subject
to paragraphs (3) and (4), the Attorney General –
(a) may at any time give to the Court a
statement of matters that the Attorney General considers relevant for the
purpose –
(i) of
determining whether the defendant has benefited from any relevant criminal
conduct, or
(ii) of
assessing the value of the defendant’s benefit from that conduct; and
(b) shall give to the Court such a statement,
setting out all information available to the Attorney General that is relevant
for the purposes of Article 5(5) and (6), if the case is one in which the
Attorney General has asked the Court to apply that Article for the purposes of Article 3.
(2) In
this Article, such a statement is referred to as an “Attorney
General’s statement”.
(3) Where
the Court proceeds under Article 3 without being asked by the Attorney
General to do so, it may require the Attorney General to give an Attorney
General’s statement within such period as it may determine.
(4) Where
the Attorney General applies to the Court under any of Articles 9, 12, 13
and 14 the Attorney General shall give to the Court, within such time as it may
direct, an Attorney General’s statement.
(5) Where
the Attorney General has given an Attorney General’s
statement –
(a) the Attorney General may at any time give
the Court a further Attorney General’s statement; and
(b) the Court may at any time require the
Attorney General to give it a further Attorney General’s statement,
within such further period as it may direct.
(6) Where
any Attorney General’s statement has been given and the Court is
satisfied that a copy of the statement has been served on the defendant, it may
require the defendant –
(a) to indicate to it, within such period as it
may direct, the extent to which the defendant accepts each allegation in the
statement; and
(b) so far as the defendant does not accept any
such allegation, to give particulars of any matters on which the defendant
proposes to rely.
(7) Where
the Court has given a direction under this Article, it may at any time vary it
by a further direction.
(8) Where
the defendant accepts to any extent any allegation in any Attorney
General’s statement, the Court may, for the purposes of –
(a) determining whether the defendant has
benefited from relevant criminal conduct; or
(b) assessing the value of the defendant’s
benefit from relevant criminal conduct,
treat the defendant’s
acceptance as conclusive of the matters to which it relates.
(9) If
the defendant fails in any respect to comply with a requirement under paragraph (6),
the defendant may be treated for the purposes of this Article as accepting
every allegation in the Attorney General’s statement in question, apart
from –
(a) any allegation in respect of which the
defendant has complied with the requirement; and
(b) any allegation that the defendant has
benefited from an offence or that any property was obtained by the defendant as
a result of or in connection with the commission of an offence.
(10) Where –
(a) there is tendered to the Court by the
defendant a statement as to any matters relevant for the purpose of determining
the amount that might be realised at the time the confiscation order is made;
and
(b) the Attorney General accepts to any extent
any allegation in the statement,
the Court may, for the purposes
of that determination, treat the acceptance by the Attorney General as
conclusive of the matters to which it relates.
(11) An
allegation may be accepted and particulars of any matter may be given, for the
purposes of this Article, in such manner as may be provided for by Rules of
Court or as the Court may direct.
(12) No
acceptance by the defendant under this Article that the defendant has benefited
from an offence or that any property was obtained by the defendant as a result
of or in connection with an offence shall be admissible in evidence in any
proceedings for an offence.
8 Provision
of information by defendant
(1) This
Article applies where –
(a) the Attorney General has asked the Court to
proceed under Article 3 or has applied to the Court under Article 12,
13 or 14; or
(b) no such request or application has been made
but the Court is nevertheless proceeding, or considering whether to proceed,
under Article 3.
(2) For
the purpose of obtaining information to assist it in carrying out its
functions, the Court may at any time order the defendant to give it such
information as may be specified in the order.
(3) An
order under paragraph (2) may require all or any specified part of the
required information to be given to the Court in such manner, and before such
date, as may be specified in the order.
(4) Rules
of Court may make provision as to the maximum or minimum period that may be
allowed under paragraph (3).
(5) If
the defendant fails, without reasonable excuse, to comply with any order under
this Article, the Court may draw such inference from that failure as it
considers appropriate.
(6) Where
the Attorney General accepts to any extent any allegation made by the defendant
in giving to the Court information required by an order under this Article, the
Court may treat that acceptance as conclusive of the matters to which it
relates.
(7) For
the purposes of this Article, an allegation may be accepted in such manner as
may be provided for by Rules of Court or as the Court may direct.
9 Powers
of the Court where defendant has died or absconded
(1) Paragraph
(2) applies where a person has been convicted of one or more offences specified
in Schedule 1.
(2) If
the Attorney General asks it to proceed under this paragraph, the Court may
exercise its powers under this Part to make a confiscation order against the
defendant, if satisfied that the defendant has died or absconded.
(3) Paragraph
(4) applies where proceedings for one or more offences specified in Schedule 1
have been instituted against a person but have not been concluded.
(4) If
the Attorney General asks it to proceed under this paragraph, the Court may
exercise its powers under this Part to make a confiscation order against the
defendant, if satisfied that the defendant has absconded.
(5) The
power conferred by paragraph (4) may not be exercised at any time before
the end of the period of 2 years beginning with the date that is, in the
opinion of the Court, the date on which the defendant absconded.
(6) In
any proceedings on an application under this Article –
(a) Articles 5 and 7(6), (8) and (9) shall
not apply;
(b) the Court shall not make a confiscation
order against a person who has absconded unless it is satisfied that the
Attorney General has taken reasonable steps to contact the person; and
(c) any person appearing to the Court to be
likely to be affected by the making of a confiscation order by the Court shall
be entitled to appear before the Court and make representations.
10 Effect
of confiscation order on sentencing of absconder
(1) Where
in the case of any defendant the Court has made a confiscation order by virtue
of Article 9 it shall, in respect of the offence or (as the case may be)
any of the offences concerned –
(a) take account of the order
before –
(i) imposing
any fine on the defendant,
(ii) making
any order involving any payment by the defendant, or
(iii) making
any forfeiture order under Article 29 of the Misuse of Drugs (Jersey) Law
1979, Article 26 of the Terrorism (Jersey) Law 2002 or Article 9 of
the Proceeds of Crime (Cash Seizure) (Jersey) Law 2008[25]; and
(b) subject to sub-paragraph (a), leave the
order out of account in determining the appropriate sentence or other manner of
dealing with the defendant.[26]
(2) Where
the Court has made a confiscation order by virtue of Article 9, and the
defendant subsequently appears before the Court to be sentenced in respect of
one or more of the offences concerned, Article 3(1) shall not apply so far
as the defendant’s appearance is in respect of that offence or those
offences.
11 Enforcement
of confiscation orders
(1) Where
the Court orders the defendant to pay any amount under Article 3 the Court
may order the defendant to be imprisoned, for a fixed term to be specified in
the order, in default of payment of the amount.
(2) The
term of imprisonment to be so specified shall not exceed 10 years.
(3) The
effect of an order of imprisonment under paragraph (1) shall be as
follows –
(a) in default of payment of the amount to which
the order relates, the defendant shall serve the term of imprisonment specified
in the order;
(b) if payment is made of any part of the amount
due, the term of imprisonment shall be reduced by such number of days as bears,
to the total number of days of the term of imprisonment, the same proportion as
the amount so paid bears to as much of the amount as was due at the time when
the confiscation order was made; and
(c) if the whole of the amount due is paid
before the defendant has served the term of imprisonment specified in the
order, the defendant shall not be liable to serve any remaining portion of that
term.
(4) The
term of imprisonment imposed under paragraph (1) in default of payment
shall not, in the case of a defendant who is liable to serve a term of
imprisonment in respect of the offence or offences, begin to run until after the
defendant has served the term of imprisonment for the offence or offences.
(5) The
reference in paragraph (4) to the term of imprisonment that the defendant
is liable to serve in respect of the offence or offences is a reference to the
term of imprisonment, or detention in a young offender institution, that the
defendant is liable to serve in respect of the offence or offences, and for the
purposes of this paragraph consecutive terms and terms that are wholly or
partly concurrent shall be treated as a single term.
(6) This
Article applies to confiscation orders made by the Court of Appeal as it
applies to confiscation orders made by the Royal Court, and references in this Article
to the Court shall be construed accordingly.
(7) Where
the defendant serves a term of imprisonment or detention in default of payment
of any amount due under a confiscation order, the defendant’s serving of
that term does not prevent the confiscation order from continuing to have
effect, so far as any other method of enforcement is concerned.
12 Reconsideration
of case where Court has not considered a confiscation order
(1) This
Article applies where the defendant has appeared before the Court to be
sentenced in respect of one or more offences specified in Schedule 1, but the
Court has not proceeded under Article 3.
(2) If
the Attorney General has evidence –
(a) that was not available when the defendant
appeared to be sentenced (and accordingly was not considered by the Court); and
(b) that the Attorney General believes would
have led the Court to determine that the defendant had benefited from relevant
criminal conduct if –
(i) the
Attorney General had asked the Court to proceed under Article 3, and
(ii) the
evidence had been considered by the Court,
the Attorney General may apply to
the Court for it to consider the evidence.
(3) The
Court may then proceed under Article 3 if, having considered the evidence,
it is satisfied that it is appropriate to do so.
(4) In
considering whether it is appropriate to proceed under Article 3 by virtue
of this Article, the Court shall have regard to all the circumstances of the
case.
(5) Where,
having decided to proceed under Article 3 by virtue of this Article, the
Court proposes to make a confiscation order against the defendant, it shall
order the payment of such amount as it thinks just in all the circumstances of
the case.
(6) In
considering the circumstances of any case the Court shall have regard, in
particular, to the amount of –
(a) any fine imposed on the defendant in respect
of any relevant criminal conduct; and
(b) any order made in connection with such
conduct under Article 2 of the Criminal
Justice (Compensation Orders) (Jersey) Law 1994.[27]
(7) Where
the Court is proceeding under Article 3 by virtue of this Article, the
requirement in Article 3(4) that the Court shall not have sentenced or
otherwise dealt with the defendant already, in the case in question, shall not
apply.
(8) The
Court may take into account any payment or other reward received by the
defendant on or after the date of conviction, but only if the Attorney General
shows that it represents the defendant’s benefit from any relevant
criminal conduct.
(9) On
an application made under Article 3 by virtue of this Article –
(a) if the Attorney General asks the Court to apply
Article 5; or
(b) if the Court considers that, even though the
Attorney General has not asked it to do so, it is appropriate for it to do so,
and the other requirements of Article 5(1)
are fulfilled, that Article shall apply notwithstanding that the defendant has
been sentenced or otherwise dealt with already, in the case in question, but in
that event no assumption may be made under paragraph (4) of that Article
in respect of any property unless it was held by or transferred to the
defendant before the defendant was sentenced or otherwise dealt with.
(10) No
application shall be entertained by the Court under this Article if it is made
after the end of the period of 6 years beginning with the date of conviction.
(11) In
this Article the “date of conviction” means –
(a) in a case not falling within sub-paragraph (b),
the date on which the defendant was convicted; or
(b) where the defendant appeared to be sentenced
in respect of more than one conviction, and those convictions were not all on
the same date, the date of the latest of those convictions.
13 Reconsideration
of determination that defendant has not benefited
(1) This
Article applies where the Court has made a determination (the “original
determination”) under Article 3(3) that the defendant has not
benefited from any relevant criminal conduct.
(2) If
the Attorney General has evidence –
(a) that was not considered by the Court in
making the original determination; and
(b) that the Attorney General believes would
have led the Court to determine that the defendant had benefited from that
relevant criminal conduct if it had been considered by the Court,
the Attorney General may apply to
the Court for it to consider that evidence.
(3) If,
having considered the evidence, the Court is satisfied that it would have
determined that the defendant had benefited from relevant criminal conduct if
that evidence had been available to it, the Court –
(a) shall make a fresh determination under Article 3(3);
and
(b) shall make a determination under paragraph (4)
of that Article of the amount to be recovered by virtue of that Article; and
(c) may make a confiscation order.
(4) Where
the Court is proceeding under Article 3 by virtue of this Article, the
requirement in Article 3(4) that the Court shall not have sentenced or
otherwise dealt with the defendant already, in the case in question, shall not
apply.
(5) The
Court may take into account any payment or other reward received by the
defendant on or after the date of the original determination, but only if the
Attorney General shows that it represents the defendant’s benefit from
any relevant criminal conduct.
(6) On
an application made under Article 3 by virtue of this Article in a case to
which Article 5 does not otherwise apply –
(a) if the Attorney General asks the Court to
apply Article 5; or
(b) if the Court considers that, even though the
Attorney General has not asked it to do so, it is appropriate for it to do so,
and the other requirements of Article 5(1)
are fulfilled, that Article shall apply notwithstanding that the defendant has
been sentenced or otherwise dealt with already, in the case in question, but in
that event no assumption may be made under paragraph (4) of that Article
in respect of any property unless it was held by or transferred to the defendant
before the defendant was sentenced or otherwise dealt with.
(7) Where
the Court –
(a) has been asked to proceed under Article 9
in relation to a defendant who has absconded; and
(b) has decided not to make a confiscation order
against the defendant,
this Article shall not apply at
any time while the defendant remains an absconder.
(8) No
application shall be entertained by the Court under this Article if it is made
after the end of the period of 6 years beginning –
(a) in a case not falling within sub-paragraph (b),
with the date on which the defendant was convicted; or
(b) where the defendant appeared to be sentenced
in respect of more than one conviction, and those convictions were not all on
the same date, with the date of the latest of those convictions.
14 Revised
assessment of benefit already determined
(1) This
Article applies where the Court has made a determination under Article 3(4)
of the amount to be recovered in a particular case by virtue of that paragraph (the
“current determination”).
(2) Where
the Attorney General is of the opinion that the value of the defendant’s
benefit from any relevant criminal conduct was greater than the value at which
that benefit was assessed by the Court on the current determination, the
Attorney General may apply to the Court for the evidence on which the Attorney
General has formed his or her opinion to be considered by the Court.
(3) If,
having considered the evidence, the Court is satisfied that the real value of
the defendant’s benefit from relevant criminal conduct is greater than
its assessed value (whether because the real value was higher at the time of
the current determination than was thought or because the value of the benefit
in question has subsequently increased), the Court shall make a fresh determination
under Article 3(4) of the amount to be recovered by virtue of that Article.
(4) Where
the Court is proceeding under Article 3 by virtue of this Article, the
requirement in Article 3(4) that the Court shall not have sentenced or
otherwise dealt with the defendant already, in the case in question, shall not
apply.
(5) Any
determination under Article 3(4) by virtue of this Article shall be by
reference to the amount that might be realised at the time when that
determination is made.
(6) For
the purposes of any determination under Article 3(4) by virtue of this Article,
the restriction in Article 5(6) (by reason of Article 5(6)(b)) on the
Court’s power to make assumptions shall not apply in relation to any of
the defendant’s benefit from relevant criminal conduct taken into account
in respect of the current determination.
(7) In
relation to any determination under Article 3(4) by virtue of this Article,
Article 2(3), Article 4 and 7(10) shall have effect as if it were a
confiscation order.
(8) The
Court may take into account any payment or other reward received by the
defendant on or after the current determination, but only if the Attorney
General shows that it represents the defendant’s benefit from relevant
criminal conduct.
(9) Where –
(a) the Court is, by virtue of paragraph (3)
of this Article, to make a fresh determination; and
(b) the case is one to which Article 5
applies,
no assumption may be made under paragraph (4)
of that Article in respect of any property unless it was held by or transferred
to the defendant before the time when the defendant was sentenced or otherwise
dealt with in the case in question.
(10) If,
as a result of the making of the fresh determination required by paragraph (3),
the amount to be recovered exceeds the amount of the current determination, the
Court may substitute for the amount to be recovered under the confiscation
order that was made by reference to the current determination such greater
amount as it thinks just in all the circumstances of the case.
(11) Subject
to Article 11, where the Court varies a confiscation order under paragraph (10),
it may substitute for any term of imprisonment imposed under Article 11(1)
a longer term in respect of the greater amount substituted under paragraph (10)
of this Article.
(12) Where
a confiscation order has been made in relation to any defendant by virtue of Article 9,
this Article shall not apply at any time while the defendant is an absconder.
(13) No
application shall be entertained by the Court under this Article if it is made
after the end of the period of 6 years beginning –
(a) in a case not falling within sub-paragraph (b),
with the date on which the defendant was convicted; or
(b) where the defendant appeared to be sentenced
in respect of more than one conviction, and those convictions were not all on
the same date, with the date of the latest of those convictions.
15 Cases
in which saisies judiciaires may be made
(1) The
powers conferred on the Court by Article 16 are exercisable
where –
(a) the Court has made a confiscation order;
(b) proceedings have been instituted in Jersey
against the defendant for an offence specified in Schedule 1 or an application
has been made by the Attorney General in respect of the defendant under any of Articles 9,
12, 13, 14 and 19 and –
(i) the
proceedings have not, or the application has not, been concluded, and
(ii) the
Court is satisfied that there is reasonable cause to believe –
(A) in
the case of an application under Article 14 or 19, that the Court
will be satisfied as mentioned in Article 14(3) or (as the case may be) Article 19(2),
or
(B) in
any other case, that the defendant has benefited from the offence; or
(c) the Court is satisfied –
(i) that
proceedings are to be instituted in Jersey against a person for an offence specified
in Schedule 1, or that an application of a kind mentioned in sub-paragraph (b)
of this paragraph is to be made against the defendant, and
(ii) as
to the matters mentioned in clause (ii) of that sub-paragraph.
(1A) The
powers conferred on the Court by Article 16 are also exercisable
where –
(a) a criminal investigation has been started in
Jersey in respect of alleged criminal conduct; and
(b) the Court is satisfied that there is
reasonable cause to believe that the alleged offender has benefited from the
criminal conduct.[28]
(2) For
the purposes of Article 16, at any time when those powers are exercisable
before proceedings have been instituted –
(a) references in this Part to the defendant
shall be construed as references to the person to whom paragraph (1)(c) of
this Article refers;
(b) references in this Part to realisable
property shall be construed as if, immediately before that time, proceedings
had been instituted against the person to whom paragraph (1)(c) of this Article
refers for an offence specified in Schedule 1.
(3) Where
the Court has made an order under Article 16 by virtue of paragraph (1)(c)
of this Article, in relation to proposed proceedings for an offence specified
in Schedule 1, the Court shall discharge the order if the proceedings have not
been instituted within such time as the Court considers reasonable.
(4) Where
the Court has made an order under Article 16 in relation to a proposed
application by virtue of paragraph (1)(c) of this Article, the Court shall
discharge the order if the application is not made within such time as the
Court considers reasonable.
(5) The
Court shall not exercise its powers under Article 16, by virtue of paragraphs (1)(a)
and (b) or (1A) of this Article, if it is satisfied that –
(a) there has been undue delay in commencing
proceedings or, as the case may be, continuing the proceedings or application
in question; or
(b) the Attorney General does not intend to
proceed.[29]
16 Saisies judiciaires
(1) The
Court may, subject to such conditions and exceptions as may be specified in it,
make an order (in this Part referred to as a saisie
judiciaire) on an application made by or on behalf of the Attorney
General.
(2) An
application for a saisie judiciaire may be made
ex parte to the Bailiff in chambers.
(3) A
saisie judiciaire shall provide for notice to
be given to any person affected by the order.
(4) Subject
to paragraph (5), on the making of a saisie
judiciaire –
(a) all the realisable property held by the
defendant in Jersey shall vest in the Viscount;
(b) any specified person may be prohibited from
dealing with any realisable property held by that person whether the property
is described in the order or not;
(c) any specified person may be prohibited from
dealing with any realisable property transferred to the person after the making
of the order,
and the Viscount shall have the
duty to take possession of and, in accordance with the Court’s
directions, to manage or otherwise deal with any such realisable property; and
any specified person having possession of any realisable property may be
required to give possession of it to the Viscount.
(5) Any
property vesting in the Viscount pursuant to paragraph (4)(a) shall so
vest subject to all hypothecs and security interests with which such property
was burdened prior to the vesting.
(6) A
saisie judiciaire –
(a) may be discharged or varied in relation to
any property;
(b) in a case falling within paragraph (1A)
of Article 15 –
(i) may
be discharged, on the application of the alleged offender and before the commencement
of any proceedings against the alleged offender, where the Court is satisfied
that there has been undue delay in commencing proceedings in pursuance of the
criminal investigation;
(ii) shall
be discharged, where the Attorney General informs the Court that proceedings
will not be commenced in pursuance of the criminal investigation;
and
(c) shall be discharged on satisfaction of the
confiscation order.[30]
(7) An
application for the discharge or variation of a saisie
judiciaire may be made to the Bailiff in chambers by any person affected
by it and the Bailiff may rule upon the application or may, at the
Bailiff’s discretion, refer it to the Court for adjudication.
(8) Where
it appears to the Court that any order made by it under this Article may affect
immovable property situate in Jersey, it shall order the registration of the
order in the Public Registry.
(9) For
the purposes of this Article, dealing with property held by any person includes
(without prejudice to the generality of the expression) –
(a) where a debt is owed to that person, making
a payment to any person in reduction of the amount of the debt; and
(b) removing the property from Jersey.
(10) Where
the Court has made a saisie judiciaire a police
officer may, for the purpose of preventing the removal of any realisable
property from Jersey, seize the property.
(11) Property
seized under paragraph (10) shall be dealt with in accordance with the
Court’s directions.
17 Realisation
of property
(1) Where –
(a) in proceedings that have been instituted for
an offence, a confiscation order is made or an order is varied under Article 14
or 19;
(b) the order is not subject to appeal;
(c) the proceedings relating to the order have
not been concluded; and
(d) the Court has made a saisie judiciaire,
the Court may empower the
Viscount to realise, in such manner as it may direct, any realisable property
that has vested in the Viscount or come into the Viscount’s possession
pursuant to Article 16.
(2) The
Court shall not in respect of any property exercise its power under paragraph (1)
unless a reasonable opportunity has been given for persons holding any interest
in the property to make representations to the Court.
18 Interest
on sums unpaid under confiscation orders
(1) If
any sum required to be paid by a person under a confiscation order is not paid
when it is required to be paid, that person shall be liable to pay interest on
that sum for the period for which it remains unpaid, and the amount of the
interest shall for the purposes of enforcement be treated as part of the amount
to be recovered under the confiscation order.
(2) When
paragraph (1) of this Article applies and interest has accrued, the Court
may on the application of the Attorney General increase (subject to Article 11)
any term of imprisonment imposed under paragraph (1) of that Article.
(3) The
rate of interest under paragraph (1) shall be such rate as the Royal Court
shall from time to time by Rules of Court prescribe.
19 Increase
in realisable property
(1) This
Article applies where, by virtue of Article 4, the amount which a person
is ordered to pay by a confiscation order is less than the amount assessed to
be the value of the person’s benefit from relevant criminal conduct.
(2) If,
on an application made in accordance with paragraph (3), the Court is
satisfied that the amount that might be realised in the case of the person in
question is greater than the amount taken into account in making the
confiscation order (whether it was greater than was thought when the order was
made, or it has subsequently increased) the Court shall issue a certificate to
that effect, giving the Court’s reasons.
(3) An
application under paragraph (2) may be made by the Attorney General or by
the Viscount in relation to the realisable property of the person in question.
(4) Where
a certificate has been issued under paragraph (2) the Attorney General may
apply to the Court for an increase in the amount to be recovered under the
confiscation order, and on that application the Court may –
(a) substitute for that amount such amount (not
exceeding the assessed value to which paragraph (1) refers) as appears to
the Court to be appropriate having regard to the amount now shown to be
realisable; and
(b) subject to Article 11, increase any
term of imprisonment imposed under paragraph (1) of that Article.
20 Application
of proceeds of realisation and other sums
(1) The
following sums in the hands of the Viscount, that is to say –
(a) money that has vested in the Viscount or
come into the Viscount’s possession pursuant to Article 16; and
(b) the proceeds of the realisation of any
property under Article 17,
shall, after such payments (if
any) as the Court may direct have been made out of those sums and then after
payment of the Viscount’s fees and expenses, be applied on the
defendant’s behalf towards the satisfaction of the confiscation order.
(2) The
amount applied by the Viscount towards the satisfaction of the confiscation
order shall be paid into the Criminal Offences Confiscations Fund.
(3) If,
after payment of the Viscount’s fees and expenses and of the amount
payable under the confiscation order, any sums remain in the hands of the
Viscount, the Viscount shall distribute those sums –
(a) among such of those persons who held the
property that has been realised under this Part; and
(b) in such proportions,
as the Court may direct after
giving them a reasonable opportunity to make representations to the Court.
21 Variation
of confiscation order where realisable property is inadequate
(1) If,
on an application by the defendant or the Viscount in respect of a confiscation
order, the Court is satisfied that the realisable property is inadequate for
the payment of any amount remaining to be recovered under the order, the Court
shall issue a certificate to that effect, giving the Court’s reasons.
(2) For
the purposes of paragraph (1) –
(a) in the case of realisable property held by a
person who has become bankrupt, the Court shall take into account the extent to
which the person has been deprived of property for the benefit of the
person’s creditors; and
(b) the Court may disregard any inadequacy in
the realisable property that appears to the Court to be attributable wholly or
partly to anything done by the defendant for the purpose of preserving any
property held by a person to whom the defendant had directly or indirectly made
a gift caught by this Part from any risk of realisation under this Part.
(3) Where
a certificate has been issued under paragraph (1), the person who applied
for it may apply to the Court for the amount to be recovered under the order to
be reduced.
(4) The
Court may, on an application under paragraph (3) –
(a) substitute for the amount to be recovered
under the order such lesser amount as the Court thinks just in all the
circumstances of the case; and
(b) subject to Article 11, substitute for
any term of imprisonment imposed under paragraph (1) of that Article a
shorter term in respect of the lesser amount substituted under sub-paragraph (a)
of this paragraph.
(5) Rules
of Court may make provision –
(a) for the giving of notice of any application
under this Article; and
(b) for any person appearing to the Court to be
affected by the exercise of its powers under this Article to be given a
reasonable opportunity to make representations to the Court.
22 Bankruptcy
of defendant
(1) Where
a person who holds realisable property becomes bankrupt –
(a) no property for the time being subject to a saisie judiciaire made before the order adjudging the
person bankrupt; and
(b) no proceeds of property realised by virtue
of Article 16(4) or 17 for the time being in the hands of the
Viscount,
shall form part of the
person’s estate for the relevant bankruptcy proceedings.
(2) Where
a person has become bankrupt, the powers conferred on the Court by Articles 16, 17, 18, 19
and 20 or on the Viscount shall not be exercised in relation
to –
(a) property which the bankrupt has placed under
the control of the Court (a remis entre les mains de
la Justice);
(b) property which has been declared en désastre;
(c) property of which the bankrupt has made a
general cession (a fait
cession générale); or
(d) property which has been adjudged renounced (adjugé renoncé).
(3) Paragraph
(2) does not affect the enforcement of a saisie judiciaire –
(a) made before the person becomes bankrupt; or
(b) on property that was subject to a saisie judiciaire when the person became bankrupt.
23 Limitation
of liability of Viscount
Where the Viscount –
(a) takes
any action in relation to property that is not realisable property, being
action that the Viscount would be entitled to take if it were such property;
and
(b) believes
and has reasonable grounds for believing that the Viscount is entitled to take
that action in relation to that property,
the Viscount shall not be liable to
any person in respect of any loss or damage resulting from the Viscount’s
action, except in so far as the loss or damage is caused by the
Viscount’s negligence.
24 Criminal
Offences Confiscations Fund
(1) There
shall be established a Fund to be called the Criminal Offences Confiscations
Fund which, subject to this Article, shall be managed and controlled by the
Minister for Treasury and Resources.[31]
(2) All
amounts –
(a) recovered under or in satisfaction of a
confiscation order; or
(b) received under an asset sharing agreement,
shall be included in the monies
which are paid into the Fund.[32]
(3) Monies
paid into the Fund shall not form part of the annual income of the States.
(3A) The
Fund shall be a special fund for the purposes of the Public Finances (Jersey)
Law 2005[33].[34]
(4) Subject
to paragraph (5), monies in the Fund shall be applied by the Minister for
Treasury and Resources for the following purposes, that is to say –
(a) in promoting or supporting measures that, in
the opinion of the Minister for Treasury and Resources, may assist –
(i) in
preventing, suppressing or otherwise dealing with criminal conduct,
(ii) in
dealing with the consequences of criminal conduct, or
(iii) without
prejudice to the generality of clauses (i) and (ii), in facilitating the
enforcement of any enactment dealing with criminal conduct;
(b) discharging Jersey’s obligations under
asset sharing agreements; and
(c) meeting the expenses incurred by the
Minister for Treasury and Resources in administering the Fund.[35]
(4A) Without
prejudice to the generality of paragraph (4), and following consultation
with the Attorney General, the States may by Regulations provide that such
particular monies or particular class of monies in the Fund as shall be
specified in the Regulations shall be applied only for such purpose as shall
similarly be specified.[36]
(5) Before
promoting or supporting any measure under paragraph (4)(a), the Minister
for Treasury and Resources shall consult the Attorney General and other persons
or bodies (including other Ministers) as the Minister for Treasury and
Resources considers appropriate.[37]
(6) Monies
paid into the Fund, while not applied for any of the purposes mentioned in paragraph (4),
may be –
(a) held in the custody of the Treasurer of the
States at the States Treasury; or
(b) placed, in the name of the States, in a
current or deposit account with one or more banks selected by the Minister for
Treasury and Resources,
and any interest earned on such
monies while held in such an account shall be paid by the States into the Fund.[38]
(7) Monies
held in any account by virtue of paragraph (6)(b) may be withdrawn on the
signature of the Treasurer of the States.
(8) In
this Article, “asset sharing agreement” means any agreement or
arrangement made by or on behalf of Jersey with a country or territory outside
Jersey for the sharing of the proceeds of criminal conduct that, as a result of
mutual assistance, have been confiscated or forfeited either in Jersey or
elsewhere.[39]
25 Compensation
where defendant not convicted
(1) If
proceedings are instituted against a person for an offence or offences
specified in Schedule 1, and either –
(a) the proceedings do not result in the
person’s conviction for any such offence; or
(b) where the person is convicted of one or more
of those offences –
(i) the
conviction or convictions concerned are quashed, or
(ii) the
person is pardoned by Her Majesty in respect of the conviction or convictions
concerned,
the Court may, on an application
by a person who held property that was realisable property, order compensation
to be paid to the applicant if, having regard to all the circumstances, it
considers it appropriate to make such an order.
(2) The
Court shall not order compensation to be paid in any case unless it is
satisfied –
(a) that there has been some serious default on
the part of a person concerned in the investigation or prosecution of the
offence or offences concerned; and
(b) that the applicant has suffered loss in
consequence of anything done in relation to the property by or in pursuance of
a saisie judiciaire.
(3) The
Court shall not order compensation to be paid in any case where it appears to
the Court that the proceedings would have been instituted or continued even if
the serious default had not occurred.
(4) The
amount of compensation to be paid under this Article shall be such as the Court
thinks just in all the circumstances of the case.
(5) Compensation
payable under this Article shall be payable out of the annual income of the
States.
26 Cancellation
of confiscation order, and compensation, where absconder acquitted
(1) Where –
(a) the Court has made a confiscation order by
virtue of Article 9(4) in relation to a defendant who is an absconder; and
(b) the defendant is subsequently tried for the
offence or offences concerned and acquitted on all counts,
the Court shall cancel the
confiscation order.
(2) The
Court may, on the application of a person who held property that was realisable
property, order compensation to be paid to the applicant if it is satisfied
that the applicant has suffered loss as a result of the making of the
confiscation order.
(3) The
amount of compensation to be paid under this Article shall be such as the Court
considers just in all the circumstances of the case.
(4) Provision
may be made by Rules of Court for –
(a) giving notice of any application under this Article;
and
(b) any person appearing to the Court to be
likely to be affected by any exercise of its powers under this Article to be
given a reasonable opportunity to make representations to the Court.
(5) Compensation
payable under this Article shall be paid out of the annual income of the
States.
(6) Where
the Court cancels a confiscation order under this Article, it may make such
consequential or incidental order as it considers appropriate in connection
with the cancellation.
27 Cancellation
of confiscation order, and compensation, where absconder returns
(1) This
Article applies where –
(a) the Court has made a confiscation order by
virtue of Article 9(4) in relation to a defendant who is an absconder;
(b) the defendant has ceased to be an absconder;
and
(c) Article 26 does not apply.
(2) The
Court may, on the application of the defendant, cancel the confiscation order
if it is satisfied that –
(a) there has been undue delay in continuing the
proceedings in respect of which the power under Article 9(4) was
exercised; or
(b) the Attorney General does not intend to
proceed with the prosecution.
(3) Where
the Court cancels a confiscation order under this Article it may, on the
application of a person who held property which was realisable property, order
compensation to be paid to the applicant if it is satisfied that the applicant
has suffered loss as a result of the making of the confiscation order.
(4) The
amount of compensation to be paid under this Article shall be such as the Court
considers just in all the circumstances of the case.
(5) Provision
may be made by Rules of Court for –
(a) the giving of notice of any application
under this Article; and
(b) any person appearing to the Court to be
likely to be affected by any exercise of its powers under this Article to be
given a reasonable opportunity to make representations to the Court.
(6) Compensation
payable under this Article shall be paid out of the annual income of the
States.
(7) Where
the Court cancels a confiscation order under this Article, it may make such
consequential or incidental order as it considers appropriate in connection
with the cancellation.
28 Variation
of confiscation order, and compensation, where absconder returns
(1) This
Article applies where –
(a) the Court has made a confiscation order by
virtue of Article 9(4) in relation to a defendant who is an absconder; and
(b) the defendant has ceased to be an absconder.
(2) If
the defendant alleges that –
(a) the value of the defendant’s benefit
from any relevant criminal conduct in the period by reference to which the
determination in question was made (the “original value”); or
(b) the amount that might have been realised at
the time the confiscation order was made,
was less than the amount ordered
to be paid under the confiscation order, the defendant may apply to the Court
for it to consider the defendant’s evidence.
(3) If,
having considered that evidence, the Court is satisfied that the
defendant’s allegation is correct, it –
(a) shall make a fresh determination under Article 3(4);
and
(b) may, if it considers it just in all the
circumstances, vary the amount to be recovered under the confiscation order.
(4) For
the purposes of any determination under Article 3(4) by virtue of this Article,
the restriction in Article 5(6) (by reason of Article 5(6)(b)) on the
Court’s power to make assumptions shall not apply in relation to any of
the defendant’s benefit from relevant criminal conduct taken into account
in determining the original value.
(5) Where
the Court varies a confiscation order under this Article –
(a) it may (subject to Article 11)
substitute for any term of imprisonment imposed under paragraph (1) of
that Article a shorter term in respect of the lesser amount substituted under paragraph (3)(b)
of this Article by way of variation of the confiscation order; and
(b) on the application of a person who held
property that was realisable property, it may order compensation to be paid to
the applicant if –
(i) it
is satisfied that the applicant has suffered loss as a result of the making of
the confiscation order, and
(ii) having
regard to all the circumstances of the case, the Court considers it to be
appropriate.
(6) The
amount of compensation to be paid under this Article shall be such as the Court
considers just in all the circumstances of the case.
(7) Provision
may be made by Rules of Court for –
(a) the giving of notice of any application
under this Article; and
(b) any person appearing to the Court to be
likely to be affected by any exercise of its powers under this Article to be
given a reasonable opportunity to make representations to the Court.
(8) Compensation
payable under this Article shall be paid out of the annual income of the
States.
(9) No
application shall be entertained by the Court under this Article if it is made
after the end of the period of 6 years beginning with the date on which the
confiscation order was made.
28A Enforcement
of confiscation orders in a country or territory outside Jersey[40]
(1) The States may by
Regulations –
(a) make such provision in
connection with the taking of action in a country or territory outside Jersey
with a view to satisfying a confiscation order as appears to the States to be
necessary or expedient;
(b) without prejudice to
the generality of sub-paragraph (a), direct that, in such circumstances as
may be specified in the Regulations, proceeds which arise out of action taken
in a country or territory outside Jersey with a view to satisfying a confiscation
order and which are retained there shall nevertheless be treated as reducing
the amount payable under the order to such extent as may be specified in the
Regulations.
(2) Without prejudice to
the generality of paragraph (1), Regulations made under it may make –
(a) such provision as to
the evidence or proof of any matter for the purposes of such Regulations; and
(b) such incidental,
consequential and transitional provision,
as
appears to the States to be necessary or expedient.
PART 3
MONEY LAUNDERING
29 Criminal
property[41]
(1) For
the purposes of this Part of this Law, property is criminal property
if –
(a) it constitutes proceeds of criminal conduct
or represents such proceeds, whether in whole or in part and whether directly
or indirectly; and
(b) the alleged offender knows or suspects that
it constitutes or represents such proceeds.
(2) For
such purposes it does not matter –
(a) whether the criminal conduct was conduct of
the alleged offender or of another person;
(b) whether the person who benefited from the
criminal conduct was the alleged offender or another person; nor
(c) whether the criminal conduct occurred before
or after the coming into force of this provision.
30 Offences
of dealing with criminal property[42]
(1) A
person who –
(a) acquires criminal property;
(b) uses criminal property; or
(c) has possession or control of criminal
property,
is guilty of an offence.
(2) For
the purposes of paragraph (1) –
(a) having possession or control of property
includes doing an act in relation to the property; and
(b) it does not matter whether the acquisition,
use, possession or control is for the person’s own benefit or for the
benefit of another.
(3) A
person who –
(a) enters into or becomes concerned in an
arrangement; and
(b) knows or suspects that the arrangement
facilitates, by any means, the acquisition, use, possession or control of
criminal property by or on behalf of another person,
is guilty of an offence.
(4) A
person who is guilty of an offence under this Article shall be liable to
imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years or to a fine, or both.
(5) A
person shall not be guilty of an offence under this Article in respect of
anything done by the person in carrying out any function relating to the
enforcement, or intended enforcement, of any provision of this Law or of any
other enactment relating to criminal conduct or the proceeds of criminal
conduct.
(6) Subject
to paragraph (7), a person shall not be guilty of an offence under
paragraph (1) if the person acquired, used, possessed or controlled the
property for adequate consideration.
(7) The
defence of adequate consideration in paragraph (6) shall not be available
where –
(a) property or services provided to a person
assist that person in criminal conduct;
(b) a person providing property or services to
another person knows, suspects, or has reasonable grounds to suspect that the
property or services will or may assist the other person in criminal conduct;
or
(c) the value of the consideration is
significantly less than the value of the property acquired or, as the case may
be, the value of its use or possession.
(8) No
prosecution shall be instituted for an offence under this Article without the
consent of the Attorney General.
31 Concealment
etc. of criminal property[43]
(1) A
person who –
(a) conceals criminal property;
(b) disguises criminal property;
(c) converts or transfers criminal property; or
(d) removes criminal property from Jersey,
is guilty of an offence.
(2) In
paragraph (1), reference to concealing or disguising property includes
reference to concealing or disguising its nature, source, location,
disposition, movement or ownership or any rights with respect to it.
(3) A
person who is guilty of an offence under this Article shall be liable to
imprisonment for a term not exceeding 14 years or to a fine or to both.
(4) A
person shall not be guilty of an offence under this Article in respect of
anything done by the person in carrying out any function relating to the
enforcement, or intended enforcement, of any provision of this Law or of any
other enactment relating to criminal conduct or the proceeds of criminal
conduct.
(5) Without
prejudice to any provision in the preceding paragraphs of this Article, the
importation or exportation for any purpose of criminal property which constitutes
or represents the proceeds of drug trafficking is prohibited.
(6) No
prosecution shall be instituted for an offence under this Article without the
consent of the Attorney General.
32 Protection
for disclosures, and defence of intended disclosure[44]
(1) Paragraphs
(2) and (3) apply where a person makes a disclosure to a police
officer –
(a) of a suspicion or belief that any property
constitutes or represents proceeds of criminal conduct and of any matter on
which such suspicion or belief is based; or
(b) of information, for the purposes of a
criminal investigation or criminal proceedings in Jersey.
(2) The
disclosure –
(a) shall not be treated as a breach of any
restriction upon the disclosure of information imposed by any enactment or
contract or otherwise; and
(b) shall not involve the person making it in
liability of any kind.
(3) Where
the person making the disclosure does any act, or deals with the property in
any way which apart from this provision would amount to the commission of an
offence under Article 30 or 31, the person shall not be guilty of such an
offence if the conditions set out in paragraph (4) are fulfilled.
(4) The
conditions mentioned in paragraph (3) are that the disclosure is made in
good faith and either –
(a) if the disclosure is made before the person
does the act in question, the act is done with the consent of a police officer;
or
(b) if the disclosure is made after the person
does the act in question, it is made on the person’s own initiative and
as soon as reasonably practicable after the person has done the act in
question.
(5) In
the case of a person (“P”) who was in employment at the time of
making the disclosure, a disclosure by P to an appropriate person shall be
treated as though it were a disclosure to a police officer, and
paragraphs (1) to (3) shall have effect as though references to the police
officer were references to the appropriate person.
(6) In
paragraph (5) and in Article 34B, the “appropriate person”
is the person designated by P’s employer in accordance with the procedure
established by the employer for such disclosures to be made.
(7) In
proceedings against a person for an offence under Article 30, it shall be
a defence to prove that –
(a) the alleged offender intended to disclose,
to a police officer, the suspicion or belief that property constitutes or
represents proceeds of criminal conduct; and
(b) there is reasonable excuse for the alleged
offender’s failure to make such a disclosure.
33 Restrictions
on further disclosure[45]
(1) Information
that is disclosed –
(a) to a police officer under Article 32 or
34A or any Order made under Article 37; or
(b) to a designated police officer or designated
customs officer,
shall not be disclosed by that
officer or by any person who obtains information directly or indirectly from
that officer, unless such further disclosure is permitted by Article 34.
(2) A
person who discloses information in contravention of paragraph (1) is
guilty of an offence and shall be liable to imprisonment for a term of
6 months and to a fine.[46]
(3) In
proceedings against a person for an offence under this Article, it shall be a
defence to prove that the person took all reasonable steps and exercised due
diligence to avoid committing the offence.
(4) No
prosecution shall be instituted for an offence under this Article without the
consent of the Attorney General.
34 Further
disclosure permitted for certain purposes[47]
(1) Article 33
does not prohibit the disclosure of information –
(a) to a person in Jersey for the purposes of a
criminal investigation or criminal proceedings in Jersey; or
(b) for other purposes in Jersey;
to –
(i) the
Attorney General,
(ii) the
Financial Services Commission,
(iii) a
police officer,
(iv) any
other person who is for the time being authorized in writing by the Attorney
General to obtain the information, or
(v) any
supervisory body designated as such by the Chief Minister under the Proceeds of
Crime (Supervisory Bodies) (Jersey) Law 2008[48].
(2) Where
the Attorney General has consented to disclosure of information and has not
withdrawn that consent, Article 33 does not prohibit the disclosure of
information –
(a) for the purposes of the investigation of
crime outside Jersey or of criminal proceedings outside Jersey; or
(b) to a competent authority outside Jersey.
(3) The
Attorney General may give consent –
(a) generally or specifically; and
(b) unconditionally or subject to such
conditions as the Attorney General may stipulate.
(4) Without
prejudice to the generality of paragraph (3), the Attorney General’s
consent may be given in terms that permit the disclosure from time to time (as
the occasion requires) of such a class of information as is specified in the
consent to such a person or authority, or class of persons or authority, as is
so specified.
(5) Without
prejudice to the generality of paragraph (3), a condition –
(a) may be expressed generally or in respect of
any specified information;
(b) may provide that information may only be
disclosed in specified circumstances or for a specified purpose; or
(c) may provide that any person or authority to
whom information is disclosed shall not disclose it to any other person without
the prior consent of the Attorney General.
34A Failure
to disclose knowledge or suspicion of money laundering[49]
(1) This
Article applies where –
(a) a person (“A”) knows or suspects
that another person is engaged in money laundering; and
(b) the information or other matter on which
that knowledge or suspicion is based comes to A’s attention in the course
of A’s trade, profession, business or employment.[50]
(1A) Where
this Article applies, A must disclose, in accordance with the conditions set
out in paragraph (1B) –
(a) the knowledge or suspicion mentioned in
paragraph (1)(a); and
(b) the information or other matter mentioned in
paragraph (1)(b),
and if A does not make such a
disclosure, A commits an offence.[51]
(1B) The
conditions mentioned in paragraph (1A) are that the disclosure is
made –
(a) to a police officer;
(b) in good faith; and
(c) as soon as is practicable after the
information or other matter came to A’s attention.[52]
(2) It
is not an offence under this Article for a professional legal adviser to fail
to disclose any information or other matter that comes to him or her in
circumstances of legal privilege.
(3) Where
a person discloses to a police officer in good faith –
(a) the person’s suspicion or belief that
another person is engaged in money laundering; or
(b) any information or other matter on which
that suspicion or belief is based,
the disclosure shall not be
treated as a breach of any restriction imposed by statute, contract or
otherwise.[53]
(4) A
person who is guilty of an offence under this Article is liable to imprisonment
for a term not exceeding 5 years or to a fine or to both.
34B Statutory
defences[54]
(1) It
is a defence to a charge of committing an offence under Article 34A that
the person charged had a reasonable excuse for not disclosing the information
or other matter in question.
(2) In
the case of a person who was in employment at the relevant time, it is a
defence to a charge of committing an offence under Article 34A that the
person disclosed the information or other matter in question to the appropriate
person in accordance with the procedure established by the person’s employer
for the making of such disclosures.
(3) A
disclosure to which paragraph (2) applies shall not be treated as a breach
of any restriction imposed by statute, contract or otherwise.
34C Cases
to which Article 34A does not apply[55]
(1) Article 34A
does not apply to information or other matter that comes to a person, as an
employer or employee, in the course of the carrying on of a financial services
business.
(2) Article 34A
does not apply –
(a) to any person designated by Regulations made
by the States for the purposes of this Article; or
(b) in such circumstances as may be specified,
to any person who falls within such category of person as may be specified in
Regulations made by the States for the purposes of this Article.
(3) Regulations
made for the purposes of this Article may designate any person appearing to the
States to be performing regulatory, supervisory, investigative or registration
functions.
(4) The
categories of person specified in Regulations made for the purposes of this
Article shall be such categories of person connected with the performance by
any designated person of regulatory, supervisory, investigative or registration
functions.
34D Failure
in a financial institution to report to designated police officer, designated
customs officer or nominated officer[56] [57]
(1) This
Article applies where the conditions in both paragraph (2) and
paragraph (3) are fulfilled.[58]
(2) The
first condition is that a person (“A”) knows, suspects or has
reasonable grounds for suspecting that –
(a) another person is engaged in money
laundering; or
(b) any property constitutes or represents
proceeds of criminal conduct.[59]
(3) The
second condition is that the information or other matter on which A’s
knowledge or suspicion is based, or which gives reasonable grounds for such
suspicion, came to A in the course of the carrying on of a financial services
business.[60]
(4) Where
this Article applies, A must disclose, in accordance with the conditions set
out in paragraph (4A) –
(a) the knowledge, suspicion or grounds for suspicion
mentioned in paragraph (2); and
(b) the information or other matter mentioned in
paragraph (3),
and if A does not make such a
disclosure, A commits an offence.[61]
(4A) The
conditions mentioned in paragraph (4) are that the disclosure is
made –
(a) to a designated police officer, a designated
customs officer or a nominated officer;
(b) in good faith; and
(c) as soon as is practicable after the
information or other matter comes to A.[62]
(5) A
person does not commit an offence under this Article if –
(a) the person has a reasonable excuse for not
disclosing the information or other matter; or
(b) the person is a professional legal adviser
and the information or other matter comes to him or her in circumstances of
legal privilege.
(6) A
person does not commit an offence under this Article by failing to disclose any
information or other matter that has come to his or her attention,
if –
(a) it comes to the person in the course of his
or her employment in the financial services business;
(b) the person carrying on the financial
services business was required by an Order made under Article 37 to provide the
employee with training, but had not done so;
(c) the training, if it had been given, would
have been material; and
(d) the employee does not know or suspect that
the other person concerned is engaged in money laundering.
(7) In
deciding whether a person has committed an offence under this Article, the
court –
(a) shall take account of any relevant Code of
Practice or guidance that applies to that person or the business carried on by
that person and is issued by the supervisory body exercising supervisory
functions in respect of that person; or
(b) if no such Code of Practice or guidance
applies, shall take into account any relevant Code of Practice or guidance that
is issued by another supervisory body; or
(c) if there is no such relevant Code of
Practice or guidance, may take account of any other relevant guidance issued by
a body that is representative of that person or any supervised business carried
on by that person.[63]
(7A) For
the purposes of paragraph (7), “Code of Practice”,
“supervised business”, “supervisory body” and
“supervisory functions” have the same meaning as in the Proceeds of
Crime (Supervisory Bodies) (Jersey) Law 2008[64].[65]
(8) A
disclosure to a nominated officer is a disclosure which –
(a) is made to a person nominated by the
employer of the person making the disclosure to receive disclosures under this
Article; and
(b) is made in the course of the
discloser’s employment and in accordance with the procedure established
by the employer for the purpose.
(9) Where
a person to whom paragraph (1) refers discloses in good faith to a designated
police officer, designated customs officer or nominated officer –
(a) the person’s suspicion or belief that
another person is engaged in money laundering; or
(b) any information or other matter on which
that suspicion or belief is based,
the disclosure shall not be
treated as a breach of any restriction imposed by statute, contract or
otherwise.[66]
(10) A
person who is guilty of an offence under this Article is liable to imprisonment
for a term not exceeding 5 years or to a fine or to both.
34E Designated
police and customs officers[67]
(1) The
Chief Officer of the States of Jersey Police Force may by public notice designate
one or more police officers (whether by reference to the name of the officer or
officers or post), being members of that Force, for the purposes of Article
34D.
(2) The
Agent of the Impôts may by public notice designate one or more officers
of the Impôts for the purposes of Article 34D.
35 Tipping
off and interference with material[68]
(1) Paragraph (2)
applies where a person knows or suspects that the Attorney General or any
police officer is acting or proposing to act in connection with an investigation
that is being or is about to be conducted into money laundering.
(2) It
is an offence for the person –
(a) to disclose to another person any
information relating to the investigation; or
(b) to interfere with material which is likely
to be relevant to the investigation.
(3) Paragraph (4)
applies where a person knows or suspects that a disclosure –
(a) under Article 32; or
(b) to which Article 34A(3) or
Article 34D(9) applies,
has been or will be made.
(4) It
is an offence for the person –
(a) to disclose to another person –
(i) the
fact that such a disclosure has been or will be made, or
(ii) any
information otherwise relating to such a disclosure;
or
(b) to interfere with material which is likely
to be relevant to an investigation resulting from such a disclosure.
(5) The
States may by Regulations specify cases in which a disclosure or interference
to which paragraph (2) or (4) would otherwise apply shall not amount to
the commission of an offence.
(6) Paragraphs
(2) and (4) do not apply to a disclosure which –
(a) is made by a professional legal
adviser –
(i) to
a client, or to the client’s representative, in connection with the
provision of legal advice to the client, or
(ii) to
any person for the purpose of actual or contemplated legal proceedings;
(b) is made by a person who is the client of a
professional legal adviser to that adviser, for either of the purposes
mentioned in sub-paragraph (a)(i) or (ii); or
(c) is made by a person who is the client of an
accountant to that accountant for the purpose of enabling him or her to provide
any of the services listed in paragraph 2(1) of Part B of Schedule 2,
and is not made with a view to
furthering a criminal purpose.[69]
(7) For
the purposes of paragraphs (2) and (4), interference with material
includes falsifying, concealing, destroying or disposing of the material or
part of it.
(8) A
person shall not be guilty of an offence under paragraph (2) or (4)
in respect of anything done by the person in the course of acting in connection
with the enforcement, or intended enforcement, of any provision of this Law or
of any other enactment relating to criminal conduct or the proceeds of criminal
conduct.
(9) A
person who is guilty of an offence under this Article is liable to imprisonment
for a term not exceeding 5 years or to a fine, or both.
(10) No
prosecution shall be instituted for an offence under this Article without the
consent of the Attorney General.
36 Financial
services business
(1) Schedule 2
shall have effect to specify what is financial services business for the
purposes of this Law.[70]
(2) The
States may amend Schedule 2 by Regulations, by adding, deleting, substituting
or varying the description of any business.
37 Procedures
to prevent and detect money laundering[71]
(1) The
Chief Minister shall, by Order, prescribe measures to be taken (including
measures not to be taken) by persons who carry on financial services business,
for the purposes of preventing and detecting money laundering.[72]
(1A) Without
prejudice to the generality of paragraph (1), such measures may
include –
(a) identification
procedures;
(b) record
keeping procedures;
(c) internal
reporting procedures; and
(d) training
procedures,
to be maintained by persons who
carry on financial services business.[73]
(2) An
Order made under this Article –
(a) may
specify supervisory authorities for the purposes of the Order;
(b) may
authorize or require any person who acquires information in the course of the
application of any procedure under any such Order, or in the course of carrying
out any function under any such Order, or under any other enactment to which
the Order refers, to disclose that information to a police officer, the
Commission or any person or institution with whom that person shares common
ownership, management or compliance control; and
(c) may make such other provision as is
reasonably necessary or incidental to the purposes of the Order.[74]
(3) No
disclosure in accordance with an Order made under this Article to any person
mentioned in paragraph (2)(b) shall be treated as a breach of any
restriction on disclosure imposed by any enactment or contract or otherwise or
involve the person making it in liability of any kind.[75]
(4) If
a person carrying on a financial services business contravenes or fails to
comply with a requirement that is contained in any Order made under this Article
and applies to that business, the person shall be guilty of an offence.
(5) Where
an offence under paragraph (4) by a body corporate is proved –
(a) to have been committed with the consent or
connivance of; or
(b) to be attributable to any neglect on the part
of,
a director, manager, secretary or
other similar officer of the body corporate or any person who was purporting to
act in any such capacity he or she, as well as the body corporate, shall be
guilty of that offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished
accordingly.
(6) Where
an offence under paragraph (4) by an unincorporated association is
proved –
(a) to have been committed with the consent or
connivance of; or
(b) to be attributable to any neglect on the part
of,
a person concerned in the
management or control of the association, the person, as well as the
association, shall be guilty of that offence and shall be liable to be
proceeded against and punished accordingly.
(7) Any
person who is guilty of an offence under this Article is liable –
(a) if the person is a body corporate, to a
fine; or
(b) if the person is not a body corporate, to
imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or to a fine or to both.
(8) In
determining whether a person has complied with a requirement that is contained
in any Order made under this Article, the court –
(a) shall take account of any relevant Code of
Practice or guidance that applies to that person or the business carried on by
that person and is issued by the supervisory body exercising supervisory
functions in respect of that person; or
(b) if no such Code of Practice or guidance
applies, shall take into account any relevant Code of Practice or guidance that
is issued by another supervisory body; or
(c) if there is no such relevant Code of
Practice or guidance, may take account of any other relevant guidance issued by
a body that is representative of that person or any supervised business carried
on by that person.[76]
(9) For
the purposes of paragraph (8), “Code of Practice”;
“supervisory body”, “supervisory functions” and
“supervised business” have the same meaning as in the Proceeds of
Crime (Supervisory Bodies) (Jersey) Law 2008[77].[78]
(10) In
proceedings against a person for an offence under this Article, it is a defence
to prove that the person took all reasonable steps and exercised due diligence
to avoid committing the offence.
(11) For
the purposes of this Article, “money laundering” includes, in
addition to the matters comprised in the definition of that term in
Article 1(1) –
(a) conduct that is an offence under any of the
following provisions –
(i) Articles 34A
and 34D of this Law,
(ii) Articles 7,
8 and 10 of the Al-Qa’ida and Taliban (United Nations Measures) (Channel
Islands) Order 2002[79], or
(iii) Articles 13–17
and 19 of the Terrorist Asset-Freezing (Jersey) Law 2011[80];
(b) conduct outside Jersey which, if occurring
in Jersey, would be an offence specified in sub-paragraph (a).[81]
PART 4
EXTERNAL
CONFISCATION ORDERS
38 Recognition
of external confiscation orders[82]
(1) The States may by
Regulations direct that, subject to such modifications as may be specified in
the Regulations, this Law shall apply to –
(a) external confiscation
orders; and
(b) criminal investigations or proceedings begun
in a country or territory outside Jersey which may result in an external
confiscation order being made there.[83]
(2) Without prejudice to
the generality of paragraph (1), Regulations made under it may make –
(a) such provision as to
the evidence or proof of any matter for the purposes of such Regulations and
Article 39; and
(b) such incidental,
consequential and transitional provision,
as
appears to the States to be necessary or expedient.
39 Registration
of external confiscation orders
(1) On
the application of the Attorney General, the Court may register an external
confiscation order if –
(a) the Court is satisfied that at the time of
registration the order is in force and is not subject to appeal;
(b) it is satisfied, where the person against
whom the order is made did not appear in the proceedings, that the person
received notice of the proceedings in sufficient time to enable the person to
defend them; and
(c) it is of the opinion that enforcing the
order in Jersey would not be contrary to the interests of justice.[84]
(2) In
paragraph (1), “appeal” includes –
(a) any proceedings by way of discharging or
setting aside a judgment; and
(b) an application for a new trial or a stay of
execution.
(3) The
Court shall cancel the registration of an external confiscation order if it
appears to the Court that the order has been satisfied by the payment of the
amount due under it or by the person against whom it was made serving imprisonment
in default of payment or by any other means.
PART 5
MISCELLANEOUS
40 Investigations
relating to proceeds of criminal conduct
(1) A
police officer may, for the purposes of an investigation into whether any
person has benefited from any criminal conduct or into the extent or
whereabouts of the proceeds of any criminal conduct, apply to the Bailiff for
an order under paragraph (2) in relation to particular material or
material of a particular description.
(2) If,
on such an application, the Bailiff is satisfied that the conditions in paragraph (4)
are fulfilled, the Bailiff may make an order that the person who appears to be
in possession of the material to which the application relates
shall –
(a) produce it to a police officer for the
police officer to take away; or
(b) give a police officer access to it and, if
so required by the police officer, permit him or her to make copies of it,
within such period as the order
may specify.
(3) The
period to be specified in an order under paragraph (2) shall be 7 days
unless it appears to the Bailiff that a longer or shorter period would be
appropriate in the particular circumstances of the application.
(4) The
conditions to which paragraph (2) refers are –
(a) that there are reasonable grounds for
suspecting that a specified person has benefited from any criminal conduct;
(b) that there are reasonable grounds for
suspecting that the material to which the application relates –
(i) is
likely to be of substantial value (whether by itself or together with other
material) to the investigation for the purposes of which the application is
made, and
(ii) does
not consist of or include items subject to legal privilege; and
(c) that there are reasonable grounds for
believing that it is in the public interest that the material should be
produced or that access to it should be given, having regard –
(i) to
the benefit likely to accrue to the investigation if the material is obtained,
and
(ii) to
the circumstances under which the person in possession of the material holds
it.
(5) Where
the Bailiff makes an order under paragraph (2) giving a police officer
access to material on any premises the Bailiff may, on the application of a
police officer, order any person who appears to the Bailiff to be entitled to
grant entry to the premises to allow a police officer to enter the premises to
obtain access to the material.
(6) An
application under paragraph (1) or (5) may be made ex parte to the Bailiff in chambers.
(7) An
application for the discharge or variation of an order under this Article may
be made to the Bailiff in chambers, and the Bailiff may rule upon the
application or may, at the Bailiff’s discretion, refer it to the Court
for adjudication.
(8) Where
the material to which an application under paragraph (1) relates consists
of information contained in a computer –
(a) an order under paragraph (2) to produce
material to a police officer for the police officer to take away shall have
effect as an order to produce the material in a form in which it can be taken
away and in which it is visible and legible; and
(b) an order under paragraph (2) giving a
police officer access to material shall have effect as an order to give access
to the material in a form in which it is visible and legible.
(9) An
order under paragraph (2) –
(a) shall not confer any right to production of,
or access to, items subject to legal privilege;
(b) shall have effect notwithstanding any
obligation as to secrecy or other restriction upon the disclosure of
information imposed by any statute or contract or otherwise; and
(c) may be made in relation to material in the
possession of a States department.
(10) [85]
(11) Provision
may be made by Rules of Court as to –
(a) the manner in which applications may be made
under this Article;
(b) the discharge and variation of orders under
this Article; and
(c) proceedings related to orders under this
Article.[86]
(12) A
person who, without reasonable excuse –
(a) fails to comply with an order under this Article;
or
(b) obstructs a police officer who is acting or
attempting to act in pursuance of such an order,
is guilty of an offence and
liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years or to a fine or to
both.
(13) If
a person –
(a) knows or suspects that an investigation to
which paragraph (1) refers is being or is likely to be carried out; and
(b) falsifies, conceals, destroys or otherwise
disposes of, or causes or permits the falsification, concealment, destruction
or disposal of material that the person knows or suspects is or would be
relevant to such an investigation,
the person shall be guilty of an
offence and liable to imprisonment for 7 years or to a fine or to both, unless the
person proves that the act or omission was inadvertent.
41 Authority
for search
(1) A
police officer may, for the purposes of an investigation into whether any
person has benefited from any criminal conduct or into the extent or
whereabouts of the proceeds of any criminal conduct, apply to the Bailiff for a
warrant under this Article in relation to specified premises.
(2) On
such an application, the Bailiff may issue a warrant authorising a police
officer together with any other person named in the warrant to enter (if
necessary by force) and search the premises, if the Bailiff is satisfied –
(a) that an order made under Article 40 in
relation to material on the premises has not been complied with;
(b) that the conditions in paragraph (3)
are fulfilled; or
(c) that the conditions in paragraph (4)
are fulfilled.[87]
(3) The
conditions to which paragraph (2)(b) refers are –
(a) that there are reasonable grounds for
suspecting that a specified person has benefited from criminal conduct;
(b) that the conditions in Article 40(4)(b)
and (c) are fulfilled in relation to any material on the premises; and
(c) that it would not be appropriate to make an
order under Article 40 in relation to the material because –
(i) it
is not practicable to communicate with any person entitled to produce the
material,
(ii) it
is not practicable to communicate with any person entitled to grant access to
the material or entitled to grant entry to the premises on which the material
is situated, or
(iii) the
investigation for the purposes of which the application is made might be
seriously prejudiced unless a police officer could secure immediate access to
the material.
(4) The
conditions to which paragraph (2)(c) refers are –
(a) that there are reasonable grounds for
suspecting that a specified person has benefited from any criminal conduct;
(b) that there are reasonable grounds for
suspecting that there is on the premises any such material
relating –
(i) to
the specified person, or
(ii) to
the question whether that person has benefited from any criminal conduct or to
any question as to the extent or whereabouts of the proceeds of any criminal
conduct,
as is likely to be of
substantial value (whether by itself or together with other material) to the
investigation for the purposes of which the application is made, but that the
material cannot at the time of the application be particularised; and
(c) that –
(i) it
is not practicable to communicate with any person entitled to grant entry to
the premises,
(ii) entry
to the premises will not be granted unless a warrant is produced, or
(iii) the
investigation for the purposes of which the application is made might be
seriously prejudiced unless a police officer arriving at the premises could
secure immediate entry to them.
(5) Where
a police officer has entered premises in the execution of a warrant issued
under this Article, the police officer may seize and retain any material, other
than items subject to legal privilege, that is likely to be of substantial
value (whether by itself or together with other material) to the investigation
for the purposes of which the warrant was issued.
(6) [88]
(7) A
person who, without reasonable excuse, obstructs a police officer who is
executing or attempting to execute a warrant issued under this Article is
guilty of an offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2
years or to a fine or to both.
41A Financial
information and monitoring[89]
(1) Part 1
of Schedule 3 shall have effect in respect of the obtaining of financial
information.
(2) Part 2
of Schedule 3 shall have effect in respect of account monitoring orders.
41B Financial
intelligence gathering etc.[90]
(1) The
States may by Regulations prescribe that there shall be a body (a “financial
intelligence unit”) to carry out functions of gathering, analysing and
transmitting financial information, in accordance with and as further provided
by such Regulations.
(2) Without
derogation from the generality of Article 42A or of paragraph (1) of
this Article, Regulations made for the purpose mentioned in that paragraph may,
in particular –
(a) designate an existing body, or establish a
new body, to be a financial intelligence unit;
(b) specify more precisely the functions of the
financial intelligence unit;
(c) make provision as to its operation and
resources and as to the appointment and employment of its officers;
(d) confer powers on the financial intelligence
unit to require the provision of financial information from such persons as may
be specified in the Regulations and in such manner and at such times as the
financial information unit may reasonably determine;
(e) specify more precisely the nature of the
financial information which may be so sought;
(f) specify more precisely the persons to
whom the financial information may be transmitted; and
(g) create offences for failure to comply with a
requirement of the Regulations and impose penalties for such offences.
(3) The
power to make consequential provision conferred by Article 42A(2) may be
exercised, in Regulations made for the purpose mentioned in paragraph (1),
so as to further amend this Law or any other enactment.
42 [91]
42A Regulations[92]
(1) The
States may make Regulations not inconsistent with this Law, for or with respect
to any matter that by this Law is required or permitted to be prescribed by
Regulations or that is necessary or convenient to be prescribed by Regulations
for carrying out or giving effect to this Law.
(2) Regulations
made under this Law may contain such transitional, consequential, incidental or
supplementary provisions, or such savings, as appear to the States to be
necessary or expedient for the purposes of the Regulations.
43 Orders
(1) The
Chief Minister shall consult the Commission before making any Order under this
Law.[93]
(2) The
Subordinate Legislation (Jersey)
Law 1960[94] shall apply to Orders made under this Law.
44 Rules
of Court
The power of the Superior Number of
the Royal Court to make Rules of Court under the Royal Court (Jersey) Law 1948[95] includes a power to make Rules for the purposes of this Law and, in
particular, for the purposes of Articles 7(11), 8(4) and (7), 18(3),
21(5), 26(4), 27(5), 28(7), 40(11) and 41A and Schedule 3.[96]
45 Citation
This Law may be cited as the
Proceeds of Crime (Jersey) Law 1999.
SCHEDULE 1[97]
(Articles 1(1),
3(1), (6), (9), 5(2)(a), (5)(a)(ii), (5)(b), 9(1), (3), 12(1), 15(1)(b),
(c)(i), (2)(b), (3), 25(1), 34(1), (2) and 35(8))
OFFENCES FOR WHICH CONFISCATION
ORDERS MAY BE MADE
Any offence in Jersey for which a
person is liable on conviction to imprisonment for a term of one or more years
(whether or not the person is also liable to any other penalty).
SCHEDULE 2[98]
(Article 36(1) and (2))
FINANCIAL
SERVICES BUSINESS
PART
A[99] [100]
Business
regulated by the Commission under regulatory laws
1. Any
deposit-taking business as defined in Article 1 of the Banking Business
(Jersey) Law 1991[101] except the doing of anything described in Article 8(2)(a) to
(c) of that Law.
2. Any
long-term business as defined in Article 1(1) of the Insurance Business
(Jersey) Law 1996[102] except –
(a) insurance business described in Article
5(5)(a) of that Law;
(b) insurance business described in
Article 1 of the Insurance Business (General Provisions) (Jersey)
Order 1996.
3.(1) Any
of the following within the meaning of the Collective Investment Funds (Jersey)
Law 1988[103] –
(a) the business of being a functionary;
(b) the business of a recognized fund;
(c) the business of an unclassified fund.
(2) However,
business referred to in sub-paragraph (1) does not include the business of
a company, being a company issuing units that is within Article 1A of the Collective
Investment Funds (Permits) (Exemptions) (Jersey) Order 1994[104].
4. Financial
service business as defined in Article 1(1) of the Financial Services
(Jersey) Law 1998[105] –
(a) including the activities described in
Schedule 2 to that Law except those mentioned in –
(i) paragraphs
1, 3B, 3C, 4, 9, 10, 14, 15, 18A and 21,
(ii) paragraph 7
where a person accepts or becomes a party to an instrument as principal,
(iii) paragraph
8 (other than the activities of persons referred to in paragraph 8(1)(c),
(2)(c) or (3)(c)),
(iv) paragraph 16
except where a person is acting as a protector of a trust by way of business,
(v) paragraph 18,
where the relevant special purpose vehicle is provided with any service that
falls within Article 2(3) and (4) of the Financial Services (Jersey)
Law 1998 by a person registered under that Law to carry on trust company
business;
(b) excluding general insurance mediation
business;
(c) excluding investment business carried on by
an overseas person mentioned in Article 1 of the Financial Services
(Investment Business (Overseas Persons – Exemption)) (Jersey) Order
2001[106] where that business is carried on in the circumstances described in
that Order;
(ca) excluding special purpose investment business
carried on in accordance with the exemption set out in the Financial Services
(Investment Business (Special Purpose Investment Business – Exemption))
(Jersey) Order 2001[107] by a person who –
(i) is
acting as a functionary within the meaning of that Order, and
(ii) is
provided with any service that falls within Article 2(3) and (4) of
the Financial Services (Jersey) Law 1998 by a person registered under that Law
to carry on trust company business or is provided with any service within fund
services business (within the meaning of that Law) by a person who is
registered under that Law to carry on fund services business;
(cb) excluding restricted investment business carried
on in accordance with the exemption set out in the Financial Services
(Investment Business (Restricted Investment
Business – Exemption)) (Jersey) Order 2001[108] by a person who –
(i) is
acting as a functionary within the meaning of that Order, and
(ii) is
provided with any service that falls within Article 2(3) and (4) of
the Financial Services (Jersey) Law 1998 by a person registered under that Law
to carry on trust company business or is provided with any service within fund
services business (within the meaning of that Law) by a person who is
registered under that Law to carry on fund services business;
(d) excluding trust company business carried on
by a person specified in any of the paragraphs in the Schedule to the Financial
Services (Trust Company Business (Exemptions)) (Jersey) Order 2000[109] specified below where the business is carried on in the
circumstances described in that paragraph –
(i) paragraph
4 (private trust company business),
(ia) paragraph
7 (incidental providers of services),
(ii) paragraph
8 (address providers),
(iii) paragraph
11(connected company),
(iv) paragraph
12 (introducer),
(v) paragraph
13 (director),
(vi) paragraph
15 (director – registered person),
(vii) paragraph
16 (liquidators and trustees in bankruptcy of persons other than registered
persons),
(viii) paragraph
18 (recruitment agents);
(e) excluding trust company business carried on
by a person specified in any of the paragraphs in the Schedule to the Financial
Services (Trust Company Business (Exemptions No. 2) (Jersey) Order 2000[110] specified below where that business is carried on in the
circumstances described in that paragraph –
(i) paragraph
1 (overseas persons),
(ii) paragraph
2 (unit holding nominee company),
(iii) paragraph 3
(electronic communications service providers);
(f) excluding trust company business
carried on by a person specified in any of the paragraphs of the Schedule to
the Financial Services (Trust Company Business (Exemptions No. 3))
(Jersey) Order 2001[111] specified below where that business is carried on in the
circumstances described in that paragraph –
(i) paragraph
1 (private protector company),
(ii) paragraph
2 (general partner),
(iii) paragraph
4 (investment company subsidiary);
(g) excluding trust company business carried on
by a person specified in paragraph 1 (connected persons) of the Schedule to the
Financial Services (Trust Company Business (Exemptions No. 4)) (Jersey)
Order 2001[112] where that business is carried on in the circumstances mentioned in
that paragraph;
(h) excluding trust company business carried on in
accordance with the exemption set out in the Financial Services (Trust Company
Business (Exemptions No. 5)) (Jersey) Order 2001[113] by a person who –
(i) is
specified in the Schedule to that Order, and
(ii) is
provided with any service that falls within Article 2(3) and (4) of
the Financial Services (Jersey) Law 1998 by a person registered under that Law
to carry on trust company business;
(i) excluding money service business
specified in Article 3 of the Financial Services (Money Service Business)
(Exemptions) (Jersey) Order 2007[114].
PART
B[115] [116]
OTHER
BUSINESS
1 Lawyers
(1) The
business of providing services by independent legal professionals.
(2) In
this paragraph “independent legal professionals” means those who by
way of business provide legal or notarial services to third parties when
participating in financial, or immovable property, transactions concerning any
of the following –
(a) the buying and selling of immovable property
or business entities;
(b) the buying and selling of shares the
ownership of which entitles the owner to occupy immovable property;
(c) the managing of client money, securities or
other assets;
(d) the opening or management of bank, savings
or securities accounts;
(e) the organization of contributions necessary
for the creation, operation or management of companies; or
(f) the creation, operation or management
of trusts, companies or similar structures.
(3) Sub-paragraph (2)
does not include legal professionals employed by public authorities or
undertakings which do not by way of business provide legal services to third
parties.
(4) For
the purposes of this paragraph, a person participates in a transaction by
assisting in the planning or execution of the transaction or otherwise acting
for or on behalf of a third party in the transaction.
2 Accountants
(1) The
business of providing any of the following –
(a) external accountancy services;
(b) advice about the tax affairs of another
person;
(c) audit services; or
(d) insolvency services.
(2) “External
accountancy services” means accountancy services provided to third
parties and excludes services provided by accountants employed by public
authorities or by undertakings which do not by way of business provide
accountancy services to third parties.
(3) “Audit
services” are audit services provided by way of business pursuant to any
function under any enactment.
(4) “Insolvency
services” are services provided by a person if, by way of business, that
person accepts appointment as –
(a) a liquidator under Chapter 4 of
Part 21 of the Companies (Jersey) Law 1991[117];
(b) an insolvency manager appointed under
Part 5 of the Limited Liability Partnerships (Jersey) Law 1997[118] as that Law has effect in its application to insolvent limited
liability partnerships pursuant to the Limited Liability Partnerships
(Insolvent Partnerships) (Jersey) Regulations 1998[119]; or
(c) as agent of an official functionary
appointed in the case of a remise de biens, cession, or désastre.
3 Estate
agency services
(1) The
business of providing estate agency services for or on behalf of third parties
concerning the buying or selling of freehold (including flying freehold) or
leasehold property (including commercial and agricultural property), whether
the property is situated in Jersey or overseas.
(2) The
business of providing estate agency services for or on behalf of third parties
concerning the buying or selling of shares the ownership of which entitles the
owner to occupy immovable property, whether the property is situated in Jersey
or overseas.
4 High
value dealers
(1) The
business of providing services as a high value dealer.
(2) A
high value dealer is a person who, by way of business, trades in goods and
receives in respect of any transaction (whether executed in a single operation,
or in several operations which appear to be linked) payment of at least
€15,000 in total.
(3) For
the purposes of this paragraph, payment refers to payment in or by means
of –
(a) cash, including notes, coins,
travellers’ cheques, and bearer negotiable instruments; and
(b) any virtual currency.
(4) “Virtual
currency” means any currency which (whilst not itself being issued by, or
legal tender in, any jurisdiction) –
(a) digitally represents value;
(b) is a unit of account;
(c) functions as a medium of exchange; and
(d) is capable of being digitally exchanged for
money in any form.
(5) For
the avoidance of doubt, virtual currency does not include any instrument which
represents or stores (whether digitally or otherwise) value that can be used only
to acquire goods and services in or on the premises of, or under a commercial
agreement with, the issuer of the instrument.
5 Casinos
(including internet casinos)
(1) The
business of operating a casino, and for the purposes of this Law, a person
operates a casino if, by way of business, the person provides a service
that –
(a) is a gambling service, within the meaning of
Article 2 of the Gambling (Jersey) Law 2012[120]; and
(b) consists of giving people an opportunity to
participate in one or more casino games.
(2) For
the purposes of this Law, a casino is an arrangement whereby people are given
an opportunity to participate in one or more casino games.
(3) “Casino
game” means a game of chance –
(a) that
involves playing or staking against a bank (whether described as a
“bank” and whether or not controlled or administered by a player);
and
(b) where
the chances are not equally favourable to all participants.
(4) For
the avoidance of doubt, the provision of the game commonly known as Crown and
Anchor does not fall within sub-paragraph (1) if it is provided at an
event where gambling is not the only inducement, or the only substantial inducement,
to persons to attend that event.
6 Unregulated
funds
The business of an unregulated
fund, being an unregulated fund within the meaning of the Collective Investment
Funds (Unregulated Funds) (Jersey) Order 2008[121].
7 Other
services
(1) The
business of providing any of the following services to third parties, where the
business is not otherwise included in this Schedule –
(a) acceptance of deposits and other repayable
funds from the public;
(b) lending, including consumer credit, mortgage
credit, factoring (with or without recourse), financing of commercial
transactions (including forfeiting);
(c) financial leasing;
(d)
(e) issuing and administering means of payment
(such as credit and debit cards, cheques, travellers’ cheques, money
orders and bankers’ drafts, and electronic money);
(f) guarantees and commitments;
(g) trading for the account of third parties
in –
(i) money
market instruments (cheques, bills, certificates of deposit, derivatives etc.),
(ii) foreign
exchange,
(iii) futures
and options (financial and commodity),
(iv) exchange,
interest rate and index instruments,
(v) transferable
securities;
(h) participation in securities issues (and the
provision of services related to such issues) except in the course of business
excluded by the operation of paragraph 4(ca), (cb) or (h) of Part A;
(i) advice to undertakings on capital
structure, industrial strategy and related questions and advice as well as
services relating to mergers and the purchase of undertakings;
(j) money broking;
(k) portfolio management and advice;
(l) safekeeping and administration of
securities;
(m) safe custody services;
(n) otherwise investing, administering or
managing funds or money on behalf of third parties.
(2) A
reference in this paragraph to providing services to third parties shall not
include –
(a) the provision of the services of collecting,
administering and disbursing service or maintenance charges (however described)
in connection with immovable property situated in Jersey (including such
property when it is occupied under a contractual lease or licence); nor
(b) the provision of a service by a company to a
connected company.
(3) For
the purposes of this Part of this Schedule, a company is connected with another
company if –
(a) the companies are in the same group;
(b) one is entitled, either alone or with any
other company in the same group, to exercise or control the exercise of a
majority of the voting rights (other than as nominee shareholder) which are
attributable to the share capital and are exercisable in all circumstances at
any general meeting of the other company or of its holding company; or
(c) the first-mentioned company holds, or a
company in the same group as the first-mentioned company holds, an interest in
the equity share capital of the other company carrying rights to vote in all
circumstances at general meetings for the purpose of securing a contribution to
the activities of the first-mentioned company or the company in the same group
as that company respectively by the exercise of control or influence arising
from that interest.
(4) In
this paragraph, “group” and “holding company” have the
same meanings as in the Financial Services (Jersey) Law 1998.
8 The
business of forming and administering legal persons or arrangements
The business of providing services
to or in respect of types of legal person or arrangement other than those
described in Article 2(5)(a) and (b) of the Financial Services (Jersey)
Law 1998, in the course of which services are provided that are similar or
equivalent to those described in Article 2(4) of that Law as if
Article 2(4) referred to that type of legal person or arrangement.
9 Virtual
currency exchange
(1) The
business of providing, to third parties, the service of virtual currency
exchange, where the business is not otherwise included in this Schedule.
(2) In
this paragraph –
(a) “virtual currency exchange”
means the exchange of virtual currency for money in any form, or vice versa;
and
(b) a reference to providing a service to third
parties shall not include a company’s providing that service to a
connected company.
10 Express trusts
(1) Acting,
otherwise than by way of business, as trustee of an express trust.
(2) In
this paragraph, “express trust” has the same meaning as is given to
that expression by Article 1(1) of the Financial Services (Jersey)
Law 1998[122].
SCHEDULE 3[123]
(Article 41A)
FINANCIAL INFORMATION AND MONITORING
ORDERS
PART 1[124]
(Article 41A(1))
ORDERS FOR PROVISION OF FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
1 Order
to provide customer information
(1) Where
an order is made under this Part of this Schedule in relation to an
investigation into money laundering a police officer named in the order may
require a person carrying on a financial services business to whom the order
applies to provide customer information for the purposes of the investigation.
(2) An
order under this Part of this Schedule may provide that it applies
to –
(a) all
persons carrying on a financial services business;
(b) a
particular description, or particular descriptions, of persons carrying on a
financial services business; or
(c) a
particular person, or particular persons, carrying on a financial services
business.
(3) The
information shall be provided –
(a) in
such manner and within such time as the police officer may specify; and
(b) notwithstanding
any restriction on the disclosure of information imposed by any statute or
contract or otherwise.
(4) A
person carrying on a financial services business who fails to comply with a
requirement under this paragraph is guilty of an offence.
(5) It
is a defence for a person carrying on a financial services business who is
charged with an offence under sub-paragraph (4) to prove –
(a) that
the information required was not in the possession of the person carrying on
the financial services business; or
(b) that
it was not reasonably practicable for the person carrying on the financial
services business to comply with the requirement.
(6) A
person carrying on a financial services business who is guilty of an offence
under sub-paragraph (4) shall be liable to a fine of level 3 on the
standard scale.
(7) Where
an individual is convicted of an offence under paragraph 1(4), the
individual shall be liable to imprisonment for a term of 6 months and to a
fine of level 3 on the standard scale.
2 Who
may apply for order
An order under this Part of this Schedule may be made on the
application of a police officer of at least the rank of chief inspector or, in
the case of an officer of the Impôts, such an officer of at least the
rank of assistant director.
3 Who
may make order
An order under this Part of this Schedule may be made by the
Bailiff.
4 Consent
required for application
An application for an order under this Part of this Schedule may
only be made with the consent of the Attorney General.
5 Criteria
for making order
The Bailiff may only make an order under this Part of this Schedule
if satisfied that –
(a) the
order is sought for the purposes of an investigation into money laundering;
(b) there
are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the person specified in the
application for the order has committed a money laundering offence;
(c) there
are reasonable grounds for believing that customer information that may be
provided in compliance with the order is likely to be of substantial value
(whether or not by itself) to the investigation for the purposes of which the
order is sought; and
(d) there
are reasonable grounds for believing that it is in the public interest for the
customer information to be provided, having regard to the benefit likely to
accrue to the investigation if the information is obtained, and to the
circumstances under which the person in possession of the information holds it.
6 Customer
information
(1) In
this Part of this Schedule “customer information” means (subject to
sub-paragraph (3)) –
(a) information
whether a business relationship exists or existed between a person carrying on
a financial services business and a particular person (“a
customer”);
(b) a
customer’s account number;
(c) a
customer’s full name;
(d) a
customer’s date of birth;
(e) a
customer’s address or former address;
(f) the
date on which a business relationship between a financial services business and
a customer begins or ends;
(g) any
evidence of a customer’s identity obtained by a financial services
business in pursuance of or for the purposes of any legislation relating to
money laundering; and
(h) the
identity of a person sharing an account with a customer.
(2) For
the purposes of this Part of this Schedule ‘business relationship’
means a business, professional or commercial relationship between a person
carrying on a financial services business and a customer where that relationship
is expected by the first person, at the time when contact is established, to
have an element of duration.
(3) The
States may by Regulations –
(a) provide
for a class of information to be customer information, or to cease to be
customer information, for the purposes of this Part of this Schedule; or
(b) extend
the meaning of the expression ‘business relationship’ for the
purposes of this Part of this Schedule.
7 Self-incrimination
(1) Customer
information provided by a person carrying on a financial services business
under this Schedule shall not be admissible in evidence in criminal proceedings
against the person carrying on a financial services business or any of its
employees.
(2) Sub-paragraph (1)
shall not apply in relation to proceedings for an offence under paragraph 1(4).
PART 2[125]
(Article 41A(2))
ACCOUNT MONITORING ORDERS
1 Account
monitoring orders
(1) The
Bailiff may, on an application made to him or her by a police officer of at
least the rank of chief inspector, make an account monitoring order against a
person carrying on a financial services business if the Bailiff is satisfied
that –
(a) the
order is sought for the purposes of an investigation into money laundering;
(b) there
are reasonable grounds for suspecting that the person specified in the
application for the order has committed a money laundering offence;
(c) there
are reasonable grounds for believing that account information that may be
provided in compliance with the order is likely to be of substantial value
(whether or not by itself) to the investigation for the purposes of which the
order is sought; and
(d) there
are reasonable grounds for believing that it is in the public interest for the
account information to be provided, having regard to the benefit likely to
accrue to the investigation if the information is obtained, and to the
circumstances under which the person in possession of the information holds it.
(2) An
application for an order under sub-paragraph (1) may only be made with the
consent of the Attorney General.
(3) The
application for an account monitoring order must state that the order is sought
against the person specified in the application carrying on a financial
services business in relation to information which –
(a) relates to an account
or accounts held with the person carrying on a financial services business by
the person specified in the application (whether solely or jointly with
another); and
(b) is of the description
so specified.
(4) The
application for an account monitoring order may specify information relating
to –
(a) all
accounts that the person specified in the application for the order holds with
the other person specified in the application carrying on the financial
services business;
(b) a
particular description, or particular descriptions, of accounts so held; or
(c) a
particular account, or particular accounts, so held.
(5) An
account monitoring order is an order that the person specified in the
application for the order carrying on a financial services business
must –
(a) for
the period specified in the order;
(b) in
the manner so specified;
(c) at
or by the time or times so specified; and
(d) at
the place or places so specified,
provide information of the description specified in the application
to a police officer named in the order.
(6) The
period stated in an account monitoring order must not exceed the period of
90 days beginning with the day on which the order is made.
2 Applications
(1) An
application for an account monitoring order may be made ex parte to the Bailiff in chambers.
(2) The
description of information specified in an application for an account
monitoring order may be varied by the police officer who applied for the order
or another police officer of at least the rank of chief inspector.
3 Discharge
or variation
(1) An
application to discharge or vary an account monitoring order may be made to the
Bailiff by –
(a) the
police officer who applied for the order or another police officer of at least
the rank of chief inspector; or
(b) any
person affected by the order.
(2) The
Bailiff may confirm, vary or discharge the order.
4 Effect
of orders
(1) An
account monitoring order has effect in spite of any restriction on the
disclosure of information (however imposed).
(2) An
account monitoring order has effect as if it were an order of the Court.
5 Statements
(1) A
statement made by a person carrying on a financial services business in
response to an account monitoring order may not be used in evidence against
that person in criminal proceedings.
(2) However,
sub-paragraph (1) does not apply –
(a) in
the case of proceedings for contempt of court;
(b) in
the case of proceedings for or in respect of a confiscation order; or
(c) on
a prosecution for an offence where, in giving evidence, the person carrying on
a financial services business makes a statement inconsistent with the statement
mentioned in sub-paragraph (1).
(3) A
statement may not be used by virtue of sub-paragraph (2)(c) against a person
carrying on a financial services business unless –
(a) evidence
relating to it is adduced; or
(b) a
question relating to it is asked,
by or on behalf of the person carrying on a financial services
business in the proceedings arising out of the prosecution.