States of Jersey
Police Force (Amendment No. 2) Law 2017
A LAW to amend further the States of
Jersey Police Force Law 2012.
Adopted by the
States 18th July 2017
Sanctioned by
Order of Her Majesty in Council 11th October 1017
Registered by the
Royal Court 20th
October 2017
THE STATES, subject to the sanction of Her Most Excellent Majesty in Council, have
adopted the following Law –
part 1
preliminary
1 Interpretation
In this Law, “principal Law” means the States of Jersey
Police Force Law 2012[1].
part 2
charging for goods and services
2 Article 24
substituted
For Article 24 of the principal Law there shall be substituted the
following Article –
“24 Charges
for police goods and services
(1) The Chief Officer may charge for the
provision of police goods and services where such provision is reasonably
incidental to normal police activity and the amount charged is in accordance
with guidelines issued by the Minister.
(2) In preparing guidelines for the purposes of this
Article the Minister must take into account the guidelines on charging for
police services (including goods) issued by the National Police Chiefs’
Council of the United Kingdom or any successor body to that Council.”.
part 3
STATES’ EMPLOYEES AND CONTRACTORS
UNDERTAKING POLICE FUNCTIONS
3 Article 1
amended
In Article 1 of the principal Law –
(a) before
the definition “Annual Policing Plan” there shall be inserted the
following definition –
“ ‘2003
Law’ means the Police Procedures and Criminal Evidence (Jersey) Law 2003[2];”;
(b) after
the definition “police officer” there shall be inserted the
following definition –
4 Articles 26 and 27 substituted
For Articles 26 and 27 of the principal Law there shall be
substituted the following Articles –
(1) The Chief Officer may designate in writing a
States’ employee as an officer of one or more of the descriptions
specified in paragraph (2).
(2) Those descriptions of officer are as follows –
(a) investigating officer;
(b) detention officer;
(c) escort officer.
(3) The Chief Officer shall not designate a
States’ employee under paragraph (1) unless the Chief Officer is
satisfied that the States’ employee –
(a) is a suitable person to carry out the
functions for the purposes of which he or she is designated;
(b) is capable of effectively carrying out those
functions; and
(c) has received adequate training in the
carrying out of those functions and in the exercise and performance of the
powers and duties to be conferred or imposed on him or her under the
designation.
(4) A States’ employee designated under
this Article shall have the powers and duties conferred or imposed on him or
her by the designation.
(5) Powers and duties may be conferred or
imposed on a designated person by means only of the application to him or her by
the designation of provisions of the applicable Part of Schedule 2 that
are to apply to the designated person, and, for this purpose, the applicable
Part of that Schedule is –
(a) Part 1, in the case of a person
designated as an investigating officer;
(b) Part 2, in the case of a person
designated as a detention officer;
(c) Part 3, in the case of a person
designated as an escort officer.
(6) A States’ employee authorized or
required to do anything by virtue of a designation under this Article –
(a) shall not be authorized or required by
virtue of that designation to engage in any conduct otherwise than in the
course of that employment; and
(b) shall be so authorized or required subject
to such restrictions and conditions (if any) as may be specified in his or her
designation.
(7) Where any power exercisable by any person in
reliance on his or her designation under this Article is a power which, in the
case of its exercise by a police officer, includes or is supplemented by a
power to use reasonable force, any person exercising that power in reliance on
that designation shall have the same entitlement as a police officer to use
reasonable force.
(8) Where any power exercisable by any person in
reliance on his or her designation under this Article includes power to use
force to enter any premises, that power shall not be exercisable by that person
except –
(a) in the company, and under the supervision,
of a police officer; or
(b) for the purpose of saving life or limb or
preventing serious damage to property.
(9) For the purpose of the handling of
complaints relating to, or other instances of misconduct involving, the
carrying out of the functions of an officer by a States’ employee
designated under paragraph (1), Schedule 3 shall have effect.
(10) The States may, by Regulations amend paragraphs (2)
and (4) and, in relation to a person designated under this Article, Schedules 2
and 3.
27 Contractors
undertaking police functions
(1) This Article applies if the Chief Officer has,
following consultation with the Minister and the Police Authority, entered into
an agreement with a person (‘the contractor’) for the provision of
services relating to the detention or escort of person who have been arrested
or are otherwise in custody.
(2) The Chief Officer may designate a person who
is an employee of the contractor as either or both of the following –
(a) a detention officer; or
(b) an escort officer.
(3) A person designated under this Article shall
have the powers and duties conferred or imposed on him by the designation.
(4) The Chief Officer shall not designate a person
under this Article unless the Chief Officer is satisfied that the person –
(a) is a suitable person to carry out the
functions for the purposes of which he or she is designated;
(b) is capable of effectively carrying out those
functions; and
(c) has received adequate training in the
carrying out of those functions and in the exercise and performance of the
powers and duties to be conferred or imposed on him or her under the
designation.
(5) The Chief Officer shall not designate a
person under this Article unless the Chief Officer is satisfied that the
contractor is a fit and proper person to supervise the carrying out of the
functions for the purposes of which that person is designated.
(6) Powers and duties may be conferred or
imposed on a designated person by means only of the application to him or her by
his or her designation of provisions of the applicable Part of Schedule 2
that are to apply to the designated person, and, for this purpose, the
applicable Part of that Schedule is –
(a) Part 2, in the case of a person designated
as a detention officer;
(b) Part 3, in the case of a person designated
as an escort officer.
(7) An employee of the contractor authorized or
required to do anything by virtue of a designation under this Article –
(a) shall not be authorized or required by
virtue of that designation to engage in any conduct otherwise than in the
course of that employment; and
(b) shall be so authorized or required subject
to such restrictions and conditions (if any) as may be specified in his or her
designation.
(8) Where any power exercisable by any person in
reliance on his or her designation under this Article is a power which, in the
case of its exercise by a police officer, includes or is supplemented by a
power to use reasonable force, any person exercising that power in reliance on
that designation shall have the same entitlement as a police officer to use
reasonable force.
(9) For the purposes of the handling of
complaints relating to or other instances of misconduct involving a person
designated under this Article, Schedule 3 shall have effect.
(10) A designation under this Article, unless it is
previously withdrawn or ceases to have effect in accordance with paragraph (11),
shall remain in force for such period as may be specified in the designation
subject to renewal at any time with effect from the time when it would
otherwise expire.
(11) A designation under this Article shall cease to
have effect –
(a) if the designated person ceases to be an
employee of the contractor; or
(b) if the contract between the Chief Officer
and the contractor is terminated or expires.
(12) The States may by Regulations amend paragraphs (2)
and (6) and, in relation to a person designated under this Article, Schedules 2
and 3.”.
5 Article 32
amended
In Article 32(1) of the principal Law, for the words “the
Schedule” there shall be substituted the words “Schedule 1”.
6 Numbering
of existing Schedule and Schedules 2 and 3 inserted
The existing Schedule to the principal Law shall be numbered “Schedule 1”
and after that Schedule the Schedules set out in the Schedule to this Law shall
be added.
7 Police
Procedures and Criminal Evidence (Jersey) Law 2003 amended
In the Police Procedures and Criminal Evidence (Jersey) Law 2003[4] –
(a) in Article 1(1)
the definition “civilian support officer” shall be deleted;
(b) in Article 50(11)
the words “or by a civilian support officer” shall be deleted;
(c) in Article 50(12),
the words “or civilian support officer” shall be deleted.
part 4
arrangements for independent custody
visitors
8 Long
title of principal Law amended
In the long title of the principal Law after the words “Jersey
Police Authority” there shall be inserted the words “, the
establishment of arrangements for independent custody visiting in order to monitor
the detention of persons in the custody of the police or immigration or customs
officers”.
9 Articles 28A,
28B and 28C inserted
After Article 28 of the principal Law there shall be inserted
the following cross-heading and Articles –
“Independent Custody
Visiting
28A Arrangements
for independent custody visitors
(a) ‘detainee’ means a person who is
detained in the custody of any of the following –
(i) the
States Police Force,
(ii) an
officer of the Impôts as referred to in the definition
‘officer’ in the Customs and Excise (Jersey) Law 1999[5],
(iii) an
immigration officer;
(b) ‘immigration officer’ means an
officer appointed under paragraph 1 of Schedule 2 to the Immigration
Act 1971, as extended to Jersey by the Immigration (Jersey) Order 1993[6];
(c) ‘Chief Immigration Officer’
means the most senior immigration officer.
(2) The Police Authority must –
(a) make arrangements for detainees to be
visited by persons appointed under those arrangements (such persons to be known
as ‘independent custody visitors’); and
(b) keep those arrangements under review and
from time to time revise them as it thinks fit.
(3) The arrangements must secure that the
persons appointed under the arrangements are independent of –
(a) the Police Authority;
(b) the Chief Officer;
(c) the Agent of the Impôts; and
(d) the Chief Immigration Officer.
(4) The arrangements must ensure that
independent custody visitors can –
(a) access information relevant to the treatment
of detainees and the conditions in which they are detained; and
(b) monitor the treatment of detainees and the
conditions in which they are detained.
(5) The arrangements must –
(a) authorize independent custody visitors to do
anything which the Police Authority considers necessary to enable them to visit
detainees and monitor the treatment of detainees and the conditions in which
they are detained; and
(b) provide for reporting on each visit.
(6) The arrangements may, in particular,
authorize independent custody visitors to –
(a) access, without prior notice or as otherwise
determined by the arrangements, any place in which a detainee is held;
(b) examine records relating to the detention of
persons there;
(c) meet any detainees there (in private) to
discuss their treatment while detained and the conditions in which they are
detained;
(d) inspect the conditions in which persons are
detained there (including cell accommodation, washing and toilet facilities and
facilities for the provision of food); and
(e) meet such other persons as the visitors
think may have information relevant to the treatment of detainees and the
conditions in which they are detained.
(7) The arrangements may allow access to a
detainee to be refused only if –
(a) it appears to an officer of the rank of
inspector or above (or a person of equivalent seniority if the detainee is not
in the custody of the Force) that there are grounds for denying access at the
time it is requested;
(b) the grounds are specified for the purposes
of sub-paragraph (a) in the arrangements; and
(c) the procedural requirements imposed by the
arrangements in relation to a denial of access are complied with.
(8) The Police Authority must publish the
arrangements it makes under this Article, including revisions to those
arrangements.
(9) Arrangements under this Article may vary between
each person or body referred to in clauses (i) to (iii) of paragraph (1)(a).
(10) Before issuing or revising any arrangements under
this Article, the Police Authority must consult with –
(a) the Minister;
(b) the Chief Officer;
(c) the Agent of the Impôts;
(d) the Chief Immigration Officer;
(e) the Police Complaints Authority; and
(f) any other person or body that the
Police Authority thinks appropriate.
(11) Independent custody visitors and the persons and
bodies referred to in clauses (i) to (iii) of paragraph (1)(a) must comply
with such arrangements published under this Article as apply to them.
(a) ‘detainee’ has the meaning given
by Article 28A(1)(a);
(b) ‘OPCAT’ means the Optional
Protocol to the Convention against Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or
Degrading Treatment or Punishment adopted on 18th December 2002 at
the fifty-seventh session of the General Assembly of the United Nations by
resolution A/RES/57/199;
(c) ‘SPT’ means the Subcommittee on
Prevention of Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or
Punishment established under Article 2 of OPCAT.
(2) The Police Authority must make arrangements
to ensure that members of the SPT may –
(a) visit detainees;
(b) access information relevant to the treatment
of detainees and the conditions in which they are detained; and
(c) monitor the treatment of detainees and the
conditions in which they are detained.
(3) The arrangements must authorize members of
the SPT to do anything which the Police Authority considers necessary to enable
them to visit detainees and monitor the treatment of detainees and the conditions
in which they are detained.
(4) The arrangements may, in particular,
authorize members of the SPT to –
(a) access, without prior notice or as otherwise
determined under the arrangements, any place in which a detainee is held
(accompanied by such experts as the SPT members think fit);
(b) examine records relating to the detention of
persons there;
(c) meet any detainees there (in private) to
discuss their treatment while detained and the conditions in which they are
detained;
(d) inspect the conditions in which persons are
detained there (including cell accommodation, washing and toilet facilities and
facilities for the provision of food); and
(e) meet such other persons as the SPT members
think may have information relevant to the treatment of detainees and the
conditions in which they are detained.
(5) The arrangements may allow access to a
detainee to be refused only if –
(a) there are urgent and compelling grounds of
public safety, natural disaster or serious disorder in the place to be visited
that temporarily prevent the carrying out of such a visit; and
(b) the Minister has notified the Police
Authority that such grounds exist and that access should accordingly be
refused.
(6) The Police Authority must keep the
arrangements it makes under this Article under review and revise them from time
to time as it thinks fit.
28C Reports
to the Minister
(1) The Police Authority must, no later than
31 March each year, prepare and submit to the Minister a report on the
working of the arrangements which it has made under Articles 28A and 28B
and the Minister must lay the report before the States Assembly at the first
reasonable opportunity.
(2) The Police Authority must prepare and
provide to the Minister such other reports on matters related to the visiting
of detainees as the Minister may reasonably require from time to time and may
prepare and provide reports to the Minister on such matters at any time of its
own motion.
(3) In this Article ‘detainee’ has
the meaning given by Article 28A(1)(a).”.
part 5
closing
10 Citation
and commencement
This Law may be cited as the States of Jersey Police Force
(Amendment No. 2) Law 2017 and shall come into force 7 days after
the day it is registered.
l.-m. hart
Deputy Greffier of the States
SCHEDULE
(Article 6)
Schedules 2 and 3 inserted
“SCHEDULE 2
(Articles 26(5) and
27(6))
police powers and duties of
designated persons
1 Interpretation of this
Schedule
In this Schedule –
(a) ‘a designation’ means –
(i) in Part 1, a designation under Article 26,
and
(ii) in Parts 2 and 3, a designation under Article 26
or 27, as the case may be;
(b) words and expressions also used in the 2003 Law
have the same meaning as in that Law.
Where a designation applies
this paragraph to a person –
(a) that person shall have the powers of a
police officer under Article 20 of the 2003 Law to enter and search
any premises and to seize and retain anything for which he or she may search
under that Article;
(b) Article 20(5) and (6) of the 2003 Law
shall have effect in relation to any exercise by that person of those powers as
if the references to a police officer in those paragraphs were references to
that person;
(c) Article 21(6) of the 2003 Law
shall have effect in relation to the seizure of anything by that person by
virtue of sub-paragraph (a) as it applies in relation to the seizure of
anything by a police officer;
(d) Article 22 of the 2003 Law shall
have effect in relation to the power of seizure conferred on that person by
virtue of sub-paragraph (a) as it applies in relation to the power of
seizure conferred on a police officer by Article 20(2) of that Law;
(e) Article 23(1) and (2) of the 2003 Law
shall have effect in relation to the seizure of anything by that person in
exercise of the power conferred on him or her by virtue of sub-paragraph (a)
as if the references to a police officer included references to that person;
(f) Article 23(3) to (8) and Article 24
of the 2003 Law shall have effect in relation to anything seized by that person
in exercise of the power or taken away by him or her following the imposition
of a requirement by virtue of sub-paragraph (d) –
(i) as they have effect in relation to
anything seized in exercise of the power conferred on a police officer by Article 20(2)
of that Law or taken away by a police officer following the imposition of a
requirement by virtue of Article 22 of that Law, and
(ii) as if the references to a police
officer in Article 23(3), (4) and (5) included references to that
person.
Where a designation applies this
paragraph to a person –
(a) that person shall have the powers of a
police officer under Article 16 of the 2003 Law to obtain access, in
accordance with Schedule 2 to that Law, to excluded material or special
procedure material;
(b) Schedule 2 to the 2003 Law shall
have effect for the purpose of conferring those powers on that person as if the
references in paragraphs 1, 3, 4, 11 and 12 of that Schedule to a police
officer were references to that person;
(c) Article 17 of the 2003 Law shall
have effect in relation to the issue of any warrant under paragraph 11 of Schedule 2
to that Law to that person as it has effect in relation to the issue of a
warrant under that paragraph to a police officer;
(d) Article 18 of the 2003 Law shall
have effect in relation to any warrant to enter and search premises that is
issued under paragraph 11 of Schedule 2 to that Law (whether to that person
or another person) as if references in that Article to a police officer
included references to that person;
(e) Article 21(6) of the 2003 Law
shall have effect in relation to the seizure of anything by that person in
exercise of the power conferred on him or her by paragraph 12 of Schedule 2
to that Law as it has effect in relation to the seizure of anything under that
paragraph by a police officer;
(f) Article 22 of the 2003 Law
shall have effect in relation to the power of seizure conferred on that person by
paragraph 12 of Schedule 2 to that Law as it applies in relation to
the power of seizure conferred on a police officer by that paragraph;
(g) Article 23(1) and (2) of the 2003 Law
shall have effect in relation to the seizure of anything by that person in
exercise of the power conferred on him or her by paragraph 12 of Schedule 2
to that Law as if the references to a police officer included references to
that person;
(h) Article 23(3) to (8) and Article 24
of the 2003 Law shall have effect in relation to anything seized by that person
in exercise of the power or taken away by him or her following the imposition
of a requirement by virtue of sub-paragraph (f) and to anything produced
to that person under paragraph 3 of Schedule 2 to that Law –
(i) as they have effect in relation to
anything seized in exercise of the power conferred on a police officer by paragraph 12
of that Schedule or taken away by a police officer following the imposition of
a requirement by virtue of Article 22 of that Law or, as the case may be,
to anything produced to a police officer under paragraph 3 of that
Schedule, and
(ii) as if the references to a police
officer in Article 23(3), (4) and (5) included references to that person.
Where a designation applies
this paragraph to a person –
(a) that person shall have the same powers as a
police officer –
(i) under Article 21 of the 2003 Law,
to seize things when lawfully on any premises, and
(ii) under Article 21(4) of that Law,
to impose a requirement in relation to information accessible from such
premises;
(b) Article 21(6) of the 2003 Law
shall have effect in relation to the seizure of anything by that person by
virtue of sub-paragraph (a)(i) as it has effect in relation to the seizure
of anything by a police officer;
(c) Article 23(1) and (2) of that Law shall
have effect in relation to the seizure of anything by that person in exercise
of the power conferred on him or her by virtue of sub-paragraph (a)(i) as if
the references to a police officer included references to that person;
(d) Article 23(3) to (8) and Article 24
of the 2003 Law shall have effect in relation to anything seized by that person
in exercise of that power or taken away by him or her following the imposition
of a requirement by virtue of sub-paragraph (a)(ii) –
(i) as they have effect in relation to
anything seized in exercise of the power conferred on a police officer by Article 21(2)
or (3) of that Law or taken away by a police officer following the
imposition of a requirement by virtue of Article 21(4) of that Law, and
(ii) as if the references to a police
officer in Article 23(3), (4) and (5) included references to that person.
Where a designation applies this
paragraph to a person, Article 23 of the 2003 Law shall have effect
in relation to anything seized by a police officer as if the references to a
police officer in Article 23(3), (4) and (5) included references to that person.
Where a designation applies this
paragraph to a person, that person shall have the same powers as a police
officer under Article 49 of the 2003 Law to require a person to
attend a police station to have his or her fingerprints taken.
Where a designation applies
this paragraph to a person –
(a) that person shall have the powers of a
police officer under Article 50 of the 2003 Law –
(i) to carry out a search under that
Article of any person at a police station or of any other person otherwise in
police detention, and
(ii) to seize or retain, or cause to be
seized or retained, anything found on such a search;
(b) Article 50(9) and (12) of the 2003 Law
shall apply to the exercise by that person of any power exercisable under this
paragraph as they apply to the exercise of such a power by a police officer.
Where a designation applies
this paragraph to a person –
(a) that person shall have the powers of an
officer of the Force by virtue of Article 51(6) of the 2003 Law to
carry out an intimate search of a person at a police station;
(b) Article 51(7) of the 2003 Law shall
apply to the exercise by that person of any power exercisable by virtue of this
paragraph as it applies to the exercise of the power by an officer of the
Force.
Where a designation applies this
paragraph to a person –
(a) that person shall have, at a police station the
powers of a police officer below the rank of Inspector to take fingerprints
without the appropriate consent under Article 55 of the 2003 Law; and
(b) the requirement by virtue of Article 55(11)(a)
of the 2003 Law that a person must be informed by an officer that his or
her fingerprints may be the subject of a speculative search shall be capable of
being discharged, in the case of a person at a police station, by the person
being so informed by the person to whom this paragraph applies.
Where a designation applies
this paragraph to a person –
(a) that person shall have the power of a police
officer below the rank of Inspector to take a non-intimate sample under Article 57
of the 2003 Law in the case of a person in a police station without the
appropriate consent;
(b) the requirement by virtue of Article 57(9),
(10), (12) and (13) to inform a person of certain matters shall be capable of
being discharged, in the case of a person at a police station, by the person
being informed by the person to whom this paragraph applies.
Where a designation applies
this paragraph to a person –
(a) that person may detain another person for a
period not exceeding 30 minutes to await the arrival of a police officer
if –
(i) the designated person has reasonable
grounds for suspecting that the other person has committed an offence, and
(ii) that other person –
(A) has
failed to give his or her name or address when requested to do so by the designated
person, or
(B) has
given his or her name or address but the designated person has reasonable
grounds for suspecting that such name or address is false or inaccurate;
(b) that person shall remain with a police
officer who arrives within 30 minutes as referred to in sub-paragraph (a)
until the person who has been detained has been transferred to the control of
the police officer;
(c) if the person who may be detained by virtue
of sub-paragraph (a) agrees to accompany the person to whom this paragraph
applies to a police station, the person to whom this paragraph applies shall be
under a duty –
(i) to keep that other person under
control while detained at the police station or in its vicinity for as long as
the person to whom this paragraph applies is responsible for him or her,
(ii) to assist any police officer or other
authorized person to keep the person detained at the police station or in its
vicinity under control, and
(iii) to prevent the escape of that other person
from the police station or its vicinity;
(d) that person shall be entitled to use
reasonable force –
(i) for any of the purposes described in
sub-paragraph (c),
(ii) for the purpose of securing, or
assisting another authorized person to secure, the detention of the person who
may be detained by virtue of sub-paragraph (a), or
(iii) for the purpose of escorting that other
person within a police station or assisting a police officer or other
authorized person to escort such a person within a police station.
(1) Where a designation applies this paragraph
to a person –
(a) that person is authorized to take an
arrested person to a police station under Article 28 of the 2003 Law
as if the reference to a police officer taking an arrested person to a police
station in Article 28(1) of that Law included a reference to that person;
(b) Article 28 of the 2003 Law has effect
in relation to the exercise of the power conferred by sub-paragraph (a) as
if the references to a person being taken to a police station by a police
officer in Article 28(3) and (9) (but not Article 28(4) to (8))
included references to that person;
(c) that person who is taking an arrested person
to a police station in exercise of the power conferred by clause (a) –
(i) shall
be treated for all purposes as having that arrested person in his or her lawful
custody,
(ii) shall
be under a duty to keep the arrested person under control and to prevent the
escape of that arrested person, and
(iii) shall
be entitled to use reasonable force to keep that arrested person in his or her
charge and under his or her control;
(d) that person who has taken an arrested person
to a police station in exercise of the power conferred by clause (a) –
(i) shall
be under a duty to remain at the police station until he or she has transferred
control of the arrested person to the custody officer at the police station,
(ii) until
he or she has so transferred control to the custody officer, shall be treated
for all purposes as having the arrested person in his or her lawful custody,
(iii) for
so long as that person is at the police station or in its immediate vicinity in
compliance with, or having complied with, the duty under clause (i), shall
be under a duty to prevent the escape of the arrested person and to assist in
keeping the arrested person under control, and
(iv) shall
be entitled to use reasonable force for the purpose of complying with the duty
under clause (iii).
(2) Without prejudice to any application of paragraph 7,
where a person has another person in his or her lawful custody by virtue of sub-paragraph (1) –
(a) he or she shall have the same powers under Article 50(7)
and (8) of the 2003 Law as a police officer has in the case of a
person in police detention –
(i) to
carry out a search of the other person, and
(ii) to
seize or retain, or cause to be seized or retained, anything found on such a
search; and
(b) Article 50(9) and (12) of the 2003 Law
shall apply to the exercise by a person to whom this paragraph is applied of
any power exercisable under this sub-paragraph as they apply to the exercise of
the power by a police officer.
(1) Where a designation applies this paragraph
to any person, that person may be authorized by a custody officer to escort a
person in police detention –
(a) from a designated police station to another
designated police station; or
(b) from a designated police station to another
place specified by the custody officer and then either back to the same or
another designated police station.
(2) A person who is escorting another person in
accordance with the authorization under sub-paragraph (1) –
(a) shall be treated for all purposes as having
that other person in his or her lawful custody;
(b) shall be under a duty to keep the other
person under control and to prevent the escape of that other person; and
(c) shall be entitled to use reasonable force to
keep that other person in his or her charge and under his or her control.
(3) A person who has escorted another person to
a designated police station or other place in accordance with the authorization
under sub-paragraph (1) –
(a) shall be under a duty to remain at the
designated police station or other place until he or she has transferred
control of the other person to a custody officer or other responsible person
there;
(b) until the other person has been so
transferred, shall be treated for all purposes as having that person in his or
her lawful custody;
(c) for so long as he or she is at the
designated police station or other place, or in its immediate vicinity, in
compliance with, or having complied with, the duty under clause (a), shall
be under a duty to prevent the escape of the other person and to assist in
keeping that other person under control; and
(d) shall be entitled to use reasonable force
for the purpose of complying with the duty under clause (c).
(4) Without prejudice to any application of paragraph 7,
where a person has another person in his or her lawful custody by virtue of sub-paragraph (3) –
(a) that person shall have the same powers under
Article 50(7) and (8) of the 2003 Law as a police officer has in
the case of a person in police detention –
(i) to
carry out a search of the other person, and
(ii) to
seize or retain, or cause to be seized or retained, anything found on such a
search; and
(b) Article 50(9) and (12) of the 2003 Law
shall apply to the exercise by that person of any power exercisable under this
sub-paragraph as they apply to the exercise of the power by a police officer.
SCHEDULE 3
(Articles 26(9) and
27(9))
designated persons:
complaints, discipline and conduct matters
1 Interpretation of this Schedule
‘Law’ means the Police
(Complaints and Discipline) (Jersey) Law 1999[7];
‘Order’ means the
Police (Complaints and Discipline Procedure) (Jersey) Order 2000[8];
‘designated
contractor’ means the employee of a contractor designated under Article 27(2);
‘designated
employee’ means a States’ employee designated under Article 26(1);
‘designated person’
means a designated contractor or designated employee, as the case requires;
‘disciplinary
policy’ means –
(a) in the case of a designated employee, the
disciplinary policy applicable to States’ employees other than members of
the Police Force;
(b) in the case of a designated contractor, any
policy of the contractor governing the conduct (as opposed to the performance) of
the designated contractor in order to determine whether a sanction or punitive
measure is to be imposed against him in relation to that conduct;
‘performance
policy’ means –
(a) in the case of a designated employee –
(i) the
capability policy applicable to States’ employees other than members of
the Police Force,
(ii) ‘attendance
policy’ means the attendance policy applicable to States’ employees
other than members of the States Police Force;
(b) in the case of a designated contractor, any
policy of the contractor governing the performance of a designated contractor
for the purposes of assessing whether the performance is unsatisfactory and
whether, as a result, any action is to be taken in relation to it.
2 Modifications of the Law and
Order
(1) Subject to the modifications set out in sub-paragraphs (2)
and (3), Part 2 of the Law and the relevant parts of the Order shall apply
to the exercise or performance by a designated person of the powers and duties
conferred or imposed on him or her by the designation as they apply to a member
of the Force.
(2) Part 2 of the Law shall be read as if –
(a) references to a complaint about the conduct
of a member of the Force referred to conduct of the designated person in
exercising or performing the powers and duties conferred or imposed on him or
her by the designation;
(b) references to disciplinary charges in Articles 4(2),
7(3)(b) and 11(1) referred to action taken under the disciplinary policy
by the employer of the designated person following resolution of the complaint
under Article 7 or investigation of the complaint under the Law;
(c) the reference in Article 7(6) to an
officer of at least the rank of the member of the Force against whom the
complaint is made were to an officer who is equivalent in seniority to the
designated person;
(d) the reference to an offence against
discipline in Article 8(a) referred to conduct by the designated person
that would justify action being taken under the disciplinary policy;
(e) the reference in Article 11(3) to a statement
by the Chief Officer were to a statement by the Chief Officer stating whether
he or she is of the opinion that grounds exist for the employer of the
designated person to take action under the disciplinary policy or performance
policy;
(f) the reference in Article 12(1) to
a recommendation by the Authority were to a written opinion by the Authority if
it takes a different view to the Chief Officer’s statement under Article 11(3)
as modified; and
(g) Articles 12(2) to (7), 13 and 14 did
not apply.
(3) The Order shall be read as if –
(a) the references in Article 2(2) and 4(1)(b)
to an offence against discipline were to conduct by the designated person that
would justify action being taken under the disciplinary policy;
(b) the reference in Article 4(1) to
suspension referred to suspension of the designation of the person under Article 26(1)
or 27(2) of this Law, as the case may be;
(c) the references in Articles 4(2) and
4(8) to a disciplinary charge or to being charged with an offence against
discipline were to action being taken under the disciplinary policy;
(d) the reference in Article 6(3) to an
officer of at least the rank of the member of the Force concerned were to an
officer who is equivalent in seniority to the designated person;
(e) the reference in Article 9(1) to the
Chief Officer considering whether a disciplinary charge should be preferred
were to the Chief Officer considering whether grounds exist for action being
taken by the employer of the designated person under the disciplinary policy or
performance policy, as the case may be;
(f) Articles 9(2) and (3) and 10 to
41 did not apply.”.